- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:28:43 +0000
- To: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Quoting Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>: > > You are assuming that protocols carry documents. Lots of > protocols carry small discrete snippets of text in separate > 'fields'. In such cases, there seems no point in allowing > multiple encodings. I'm assuming that there are one or more protocols that do carry documents, and hence would benefit from allowing both UTF-8 and UTF-16. -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt
Received on Monday, 8 March 2004 07:28:44 UTC