Re: RDDL2 Background

On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:51, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
[...]
> > So I cooked up RDDL2, which used the existing mechanisms in XHTML and 
> > had a whole lot less markup, and I thought did a lot better job of 
> > hitting the 80/20 point.
> 
> I don't think so, unless all my (real world) use cases are outside your
> 80%.

pointers to a few such cases, please?

I haven't studied RDDL1 enough to know if it's better or worse; I
suspect either would meet my needs.

But I'm always interested in real world cases.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 19 January 2004 17:59:26 UTC