- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:07:40 +0200
- To: "ext Jon Hanna" <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Cc: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>, Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Feb 25, 2004, at 12:40, ext Jon Hanna wrote: > > ... I remain unconvinced of the case > for MGET. Can you demonstrate how the equivalent behavior can be implemented using the existing methods without resulting in either (a) multiple requests for each single logical operation or (b) unintended side effects in the case of misunderstanding between client and server, or (c) efficient and explicit failure if the request is not understood? I'm not religiously devoted to new methods. If there is a way to accomplish the same results as provided by URIQA without introducing new methods, then that would definitely be preferable. But I've not been able to see how it could be done. Are you unconvinced because you know of a better way, or simply because you don't have any acute need for the functionality offered by URIQA? Regards, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 08:09:17 UTC