- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:51:30 +0100
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'www-tag@w3.org'" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 7:07:45 PM, AJ wrote: MAA> Hi, MAA> Somebody has probably picked this up already, but in case they haven't: MAA> In section (1. Introduction) it is stated that: MAA> '... the resource is a periodically updated report on the weather in Oaxaca, MAA> and the URI is "http://weather.example.com/oaxaca".' MAA> In section (2.3.2. Representation reuse) it is stated that: MAA> '... there are two resources: "the current weather in Oaxaca" and "the MAA> weather in Oaxaca on 1 August 2004". The Oaxaca weather site assigns two MAA> URIs to these two different resources.' MAA> So is the resource denoted by MAA> http://weather.example.com/oaxaca 'the current MAA> weather in Oaxaca' or 'a *report* on the current weather in Oaxaca'? The latter. There could be other reports, which would have different URIs. I agree that 2.3.2 is too informal and should be clarified, perhaps like this '... there are two resources: a report of "the current weather in Oaxaca" and of "the of weather in Oaxaca on 1 August 2004". The Oaxaca weather site assigns two URIs to these two different resources.' It might also be noted that on 1 August 2004, those two URIs might well return identical representations. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2004 20:51:33 UTC