- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:19:20 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Hi Dan, On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:05:38PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 09:50, Mark Baker wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I believe there to be a rather large Web-architectural flaw with the > > recent WS-Addressing submission[1] that I wanted to raise with the TAG. > > I'd expect you to bring it to the attention of the TAG if you want > one of the TAG's documents changed. I don't see in your message > any request to change a TAG document or even to write a new one. Sorry, I intended it to be implicit in my message that I'd like to raise an issue. My apologies for not making that clear. > Am I missing something? > > Where does the WS-Addressing submission direct feedback? Hmm... I don't > see anything in the SOTD except the generic link to the list > of acknowledged submissions... if you know enough to look for it, > you can find the team comment, where Hugo writes... > > "Feedback on this technology is encouraged on the www-ws@w3.org mailing > list (public archive)." > -- http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/05/Comment Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. But I think I'm working within the bounds of documented process to request that the TAG consider architectural issues with member submissions. Am I mistaken? FWIW, I did talk about this with Hugo, but he's been away, and it's my understanding that discussion is well under way to charter a WG to develop a WS-Addressing-like specification. I didn't want to end up waiting too long to do that. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:18:07 UTC