- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:58:15 -0400
- To: Collin Hsu <collin@seu.edu.cn>
- Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org, www-tag@w3.org
Collin Hsu scripsit:
> According to RFC 2396, a URI reference is of the form as follow,
>
> Absolute URI | Relative URI [ fragment identifier ]
>
> As a result, if all URIs can ben identified as "absolute URI", then all
> URIs can also be called "URI references".
The term "URI", as opposed to "absolute URI", "relative URI", and "URI reference",
is not formally defined by RFC 2396. Its proposed successor does define the term.
--
They do not preach John Cowan
that their God will rouse them jcowan@reutershealth.com
A little before the nuts work loose. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
They do not teach http://www.reutershealth.com
that His Pity allows them --Rudyard Kipling,
to drop their job when they damn-well choose. "The Sons of Martha"
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:58:26 UTC