www-tag@w3.org from September 2003 by date

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (review of some terms) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Tim Bray
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Tim Bray
• RE: Use of metadata in URIs Williams, Stuart
• RE: Use of metadata in URIs Larry Masinter
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft David Orchard
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft David Orchard
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Tim Bray

Monday, 29 September 2003

• Re: [Minutes] 29 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc, mtg planning) Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft David Orchard

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 29 September 2003

• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Tim Bray
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Tim Bray
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Roy T. Fielding
• [Minutes] 29 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc, mtg planning) Ian B. Jacobs
• Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (review of some terms) Olivier Fehr
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (review of some t erms) Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (review of some terms) Dan Connolly
• RE: Use of metadata in URIs Olivier Fehr
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Williams, Stuart
• Re: Use of metadata in URIs Joern Clausen
• RE: Use of metadata in URIs Williams, Stuart

Sunday, 28 September 2003

• Use of metadata in URIs Larry Masinter

Saturday, 27 September 2003

• RFC 2119 & point categorization Mark Baker

Friday, 26 September 2003

• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (psbook hardcopy form) Dan Connolly
• Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract David Orchard
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract David Orchard
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 25 September 2003

• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Roy T. Fielding
• Re: AddDefaultCharset considered harmful (Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023) Tim Bray
• AddDefaultCharset considered harmful (Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023) Martin Duerst
• [Agenda] 29 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc, meeting planning) Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 24 September 2003

• Schema component designators (re rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6, 37) Dan Connolly
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Addison Phillips [wM]
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Tim Bray
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Sandro Hawke
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [Fwd: Re: Updated finding: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST"] Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Tim Berners-Lee

Tuesday, 23 September 2003

• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract David Orchard
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Roy T. Fielding
• Arch Doc: 18 Sep: status Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Joshua Allen

Monday, 22 September 2003

• Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Tim Bray
• RE: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft Dan Connolly
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Addison Phillips [wM]
• Accepted TAG finding: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST" Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft Dan Connolly
• Canceled: 22 Sep 2003 TAG teleconference Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Williams, Stuart
• RE: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Massimo Marchiori
• RE: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft (UML, OWL/RDFS) Dan Connolly
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Karl Dubost
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Dan Connolly
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Norman Walsh
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Martin Duerst
• Re: Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict jalgermissen@topicmapping.com
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Karl Dubost
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict Tim Bray
• Opacity and mailto: in conflict Norman Walsh
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Aaron Swartz
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto

Sunday, 21 September 2003

• Arch Doc: 18th September 2003 Editors Draft Williams, Stuart
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft Norman Walsh
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Aaron Swartz
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Aaron Swartz
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto

Saturday, 20 September 2003

• RE: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft David Orchard
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto
• Re: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 19 September 2003

• RE: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft David Orchard
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft Norman Walsh
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Stefano Mazzocchi
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Stefano Mazzocchi
• Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft David Orchard
• Updated finding: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft Norman Walsh
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 John Cowan
• Comments on mime-respect Martin Duerst
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 John Cowan
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Martin Duerst
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 François Yergeau
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Tim Bray
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Tim Bray
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Martin Duerst
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Martin Duerst
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Martin Duerst
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Martin Duerst
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 John Cowan
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Francois Yergeau
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Francois Yergeau
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto

Friday, 19 September 2003

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 MURATA Makoto
• RE: WhenToUseGet-7 comments Larry Masinter
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 John Cowan
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Versioning and extensibility Norman Walsh

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• [Agenda] 22 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc, Findings) Ian B. Jacobs
• Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Tim Bray
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? Dan Connolly
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Francois Yergeau
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Christoph Schneegans
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Martin Duerst
• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? Graham Klyne
• RE: Liberal "URI assignment policies" will create confusion? Williams, Stuart
• RE: Liberal "URI assignment policies" will create confusion? Ossi Nykänen
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Tim Bray
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Bjoern Hoehrmann

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? Tim Bray
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Francois Yergeau
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Francois Yergeau
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 John Cowan
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 Tim Bray
• Re: New RDDL draft Jonathan Borden
• RE: Liberal "URI assignment policies" will create confusion? Williams, Stuart
• Re: whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET Mark Baker
• Re: whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET Mark Baker
• Re: whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET Tim Bray
• RE: whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET Williams, Stuart
• RE: WhenToUseGet-7 comments David Orchard
• whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET Mark Baker
• RE: WhenToUseGet-7 comments Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: WhenToUseGet-7 comments David Orchard
• Re: WhenToUseGet-7 comments Dan Connolly
• Re: WhenToUseGet-7 comments Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: WhenToUseGet-7 comments Dan Connolly
• Liberal "URI assignment policies" will create confusion? Ossi Nykänen
• Summary of TAG activity from 10 Aug to 10 Sep 2003 Ian B. Jacobs

Tuesday, 16 September 2003

• Updated finding: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST" Ian B. Jacobs
• noodling on contentTypeOverride-29 Roy T. Fielding
• Can we revise RFC3023? Tim Bray

Monday, 15 September 2003

• [Minutes] 15 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (namespaceDocument-8, deepLinking-25, whenToUseGet-7, contentTypeOverride-29) Ian B. Jacobs
• New RDDL draft Tim Bray
• WhenToUseGet-7 comments David Orchard
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Sandro Hawke
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Dan Connolly
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Jonathan Borden

Sunday, 14 September 2003

• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Sandro Hawke
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Stefano Mazzocchi

Saturday, 13 September 2003

• The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs Stefano Mazzocchi
• Re: What CNN thinks the Web Is Mark Nottingham
• rdfURIMeaning-39] Fwd: Re: Hidden triples and self-description Jonathan Borden

Friday, 12 September 2003

• RE: Basics of XML Schema inheritance Martin Gudgin
• Basics of XML Schema inheritance Rao, Rajesh
• RE: Revised TAG finding: '"Deep Linking" in the World Wide Web' Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Revised TAG finding: '"Deep Linking" in the World Wide Web' Kay, Michael

Thursday, 11 September 2003

• Re: Form submission when successful controls contain characters outside the submission character set Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: Re: Form submission when successful controls contain characters outside the submission character set Paul Cotton
• Re: [Minutes] 8 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, charmodReview-17, namespaceDocument-8, versioning/extensibility) Ian B. Jacobs
• [Agenda] 15 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (namespaceDocument-8, Findings) Ian B. Jacobs
• [Agenda] 15 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (namespaceDocument-8, Findings) Ian B. Jacobs
• Revised TAG finding: '"Deep Linking" in the World Wide Web' Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: [Minutes] 8 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, charmodRevie w-17, namespaceDocument-8, versioning/extensibility) Williams, Stuart
• Fwd: Re: Form submission when successful controls contain characters outside the submission character set Chris Lilley

Wednesday, 10 September 2003

• [Minutes] 8 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, charmodReview-17, namespaceDocument-8, versioning/extensibility) Ian B. Jacobs

Saturday, 6 September 2003

• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)

Friday, 5 September 2003

• Re: TAG telcon 18Aug: IRC record Ian B. Jacobs
• [Agenda] 8 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg. sched, deliv. sched., namespaceDocument-8, Versioning/Extensibility) Ian B. Jacobs

Thursday, 4 September 2003

• Re: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Tim Bray
• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Eamonn Neylon
• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Williams, Stuart

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• Re: Action: Rewrite para 4 of 4.10.4. Norman Walsh
• Re: Action: Rewrite para 4 of 4.10.4. Tim Bray
• Action: Rewrite para 4 of 4.10.4. Norman Walsh
• Re: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Mark Baker
• Re: Action: Redraft 4.10.2 to include some good practice notes noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: new TAG issue: rdfURIMeaning-39 Dan Brickley
• new TAG issue: rdfURIMeaning-39 Dan Connolly
• Action: Redraft 4.10.2 to include some good practice notes Norman Walsh
• Re: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Tim Bray
• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Williams, Stuart

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 17:50:48 UTC