W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2003

RE: URIEquivalence-15

From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:00:10 -0500
Message-ID: <E7AC4500EAB7A442ABA7521D18814397063248CB@tor-msg-01.northamerica.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "www-tag" <www-tag@w3.org>

>I think that Tim Bray's draft finding has been faithfully inserted into
[1]

+1.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Williams, Stuart [mailto:skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: March 31, 2003 12:37 PM
> To: 'www-tag'
> Subject: URIEquivalence-15
> 
> 
> Paul and I were tasked with reviewing whether the latest draft of
> RFC2396bis
> [1] "satisfies URIEquivalence-15."
> 
> Briefly, I think that Tim Bray's draft finding has been faithfully
> inserted
> into [1]. I think that as a whole there are then some internal
conflicts
> within the [1] eg. The final paragraph of section 4 (just before 4.1)
> endows
> . and .. with special meaning only when used within a relative URI
> reference
> while section 6.2.2.3 within the URI equivalance text says that . and
..
> shouldn't appear within absolute URI, but if they do its ok to
normalise
> the
> path and cutely I think addresses how by splitting absolute URI ref
into a
> base and a relative URI. These two sections seem slightly at odds.
> 
> I have a couple of other comments to file against the URI equivalence
> text... But on the whole I am happy that the text in [1] serves as our
> finding and that we discuss any further refinements on the uri@w3.org
as
> comments made on the ID - and yes... As it matures we will have to
ensure
> that it continues to reflect the TAGs intent.
> 
> I'll make other comments on uri@w3.org and post a pointer here whenI
have
> done so.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Stuart
> [1] http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html
Received on Monday, 31 March 2003 14:00:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:58 UTC