- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:50:32 +0200
- To: <jonathan@openhealth.org>, <tbray@textuality.com>, <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Jonathan Borden [mailto:jonathan@openhealth.org] > Sent: 05 March, 2003 18:28 > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere); tbray@textuality.com; > sandro@w3.org > Cc: www-tag@w3.org > Subject: Re: siteData-36: strawman + httpRange-14 [ "Resource-Type:" ] > > > Patrick, > > > > > > > > > ... a point of RDF datatyping is that a property's > > > _datatype_ is a function of the property, so that we might have: > > > > Err... no. Unfortunately, it's not. There is no way to do > > RDF datatyping in terms of property-specific knowledge. > > oops, right. My point was only that we don't need to overload > each and every > use of a date on the "dc:date" property. > > > > > RDF Datatype provides no machinery whatsoever for global > > datatyping, such that a specific datatype can be associated > > with a property and that datatype is used to interpret > > non-explicitly datatyped literal values. > > right, so neither can RDF say that "dc:date" is a date > either... this is an > orthogonal issue to the original discussion, but you are correct. > > In any case I hope you will agree that given > > site:last-modification-date rdfs:domain ex:Site . > > foo:bar site:last-modification-date "2003-03-05" . > > that we can infer: > > foo:bar rdf:type ex:Site . Sure. Patrick
Received on Monday, 17 March 2003 04:50:46 UTC