TAG Telcon Agenda - 10th March 2003


Apologies, that this is going out *very* late.

HTML version at http://www.w3.org/2003/03/10-tag.

Text version below.

Best regards

Stuart Williams

   [1]W3C [2]| TAG | Previous: [3]24 Feb teleconference | Next: 17 Mar
   2003 teleconf

      [1] http://www.w3.org/
      [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
      [3] http://www.w3.org/2003/02/24-tag-summary.html

                   Agenda for 10 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference

   Nearby: [4]Teleconference details  [5]issues list  [6]www-tag

      [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
      [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
      [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/

   Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
   business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (30min)

    1. Confirm Chair, Scribe
    2. Accept [7]24 Feb telecon minutes?
    3. Accept this [8]agenda?
    4. Next meeting: 17 March?

      [7] http://www.w3.org/2003/02/24-tag-summary.html
      [8] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/10-tag.html

  1.1 Meeting planning

     * May schedule? See [9]thread from SW.
     * Proposed 14-15 Nov Japan
     * If confirmed, IJ to ask Member calendar to be updated.

      [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0003.html

  1.2 Mailing list management

     * Action SW: Send draft mailing list policy to tag@w3.org. (See
       [10]preliminary announcement)

     [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0196.html

  1.3 Review of input from technical plenary

     * Feedback about TAG process?
     * Feedback on specific issues?

  1.4 Other stuff

     * Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
       actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working with
       PLH on this.

2. Technical (60min)

  2.1 Architecture document

   See also: [11]findings.
    1. [12]21 Feb 2003 Editor's Draft of Arch Doc:
         1. Resolve to request publication of this draft (with
            modifications?) on TR page?
         2. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under
         3. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and
            incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design
         4. Action DO2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web
            services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste
            and put into DC writing.
         5. Action CL 2003/0127: Draft language for arch doc that takes
            language from internet media type registration, propose for
            arch doc, include sentiment of TB's second sentence from
         6. Action TB 2003/01/27: Develop CP11 more: Avoid designing new
            protocols if you can accomplish what you want with HTTP. DC
            suggested describing GET/PUT/POST in a para each, then say
            "if your app looks like that, use HTTP". [13]Proposal from TB
            to withdraw the proposal.

     [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
     [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030221
     [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0005

  2.2 Issues

   Prioritization pass?
     * [14]siteData-36
          + Completed action TB: Post a [15]strawman proposal for
          + Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
     * [16]namespaceDocument-8
          + Next steps on [17]RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray/Paul Cotton
     * [18]xmlFunctions-34
          + Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
            XML Core work. Deadline 17 Feb.
     * [19]binaryXML-30
          + Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
            adding to survey.
          + Next steps to finding? See [20]summary from Chris.
     * [21]contentPresentation-26
          + Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space.
            Deadline 3 March.

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
     [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0297.html
     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
     [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0213
     [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
     [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
     [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html

     * [22]URIEquivalence-15
          + See [23]draft 4. See also [24]email from Larry Masinter on
            xml namespaces.
          + TBL 2003/01/20: Send email to uri@w3.org requesting
            terminology change (regarding definition of "URI").
          + Completed Action TB 2003/02/06: Send URI equiv draft finding
            to uri@w3.org. Done (URI?)
     * [25]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
          + Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
            desideratum ([26]RQ-23). See input from Jonathan Marsh
            ([27]forwarded by Paul Cotton).
     * [28]uriMediaType-9
          + Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on
            discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
     * [29]RDFinXHTML-35
          + Action DC 2003/02/06: Write up a crisp articulation of issue
            RDFINHTML-35. [DC says - don't expect results before May 2003
     * [30]HTTPSubstrate-16
          + Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
            the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
            to be excluded from RFC 3205
          + See [31]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
     * [32]errorHandling-20
          + Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
            (1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
            robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
            has been signaled. Deadline first week of March.
     * [33]IRIEverywhere-27
          + Action CL 2003/01/27: Send piece that CL/MD/IJ wrote to
     * [34]metadataInURI-31
          + Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
     * [35]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
         1. Connection to content negotiation?
         2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
         3. No actions associated.
     * [36]contentTypeOverride-24
          + See [37]email from DC to Voice Browser WG. Does this resolve
            this issue?

     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
     [23] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4.html
     [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0090.htm
     [26] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
     [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0207.html
     [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
     [29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#RDFinXHTML-35
     [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
     [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
     [32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
     [33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
     [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
     [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
     [37] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0085.html


    Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
    Last modified: $Date: 2003/03/07 18:45:41 $

Received on Monday, 10 March 2003 04:58:07 UTC