- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 26 Jun 2003 16:32:30 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The agenda for the 30 June 2003 TAG teleconference
is available as HTML [1] and as text below.
- Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/30-tag.html
==================================================
Agenda for 30 June 2003 TAG teleconference
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
1. Administrative (15min)
1. Confirm Chair (SW), Scribe (IJ). Regrets: DO, PC. Possible
regrets: NW, RF
2. Accept minutes of [7]30 Jun teleconference?
3. Accept this [8]agenda?
4. Next meeting: 7 July?
5. Next meeting with Voice WG?
6. Proposed three-week summer break: No meeting 18 Aug, 25 Aug, 1 Sep
[7] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/23-tag-summary.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/30-tag.html
2. Technical (75 mins)
2.1 Architecture document (10 minutes)
Update on [9]26 June 2003 Editor's Draft of Arch Doc and whether IJ
will request/has requested to publish (or has already). If not, next
steps?
1. Action RF 2003/06/02: Rewrite section 5. Section 5 is expected to
be short.
2. Action DO 2003/06/02: Write up a couple of paragraphs on
extensibility for section 4.
3. Action IJ 2003/06/16: Attempt to incorporate relevant bits of
"[10]Conversations and State" into section to be produced by RF.
4. Action PC 2003/06/16: Send second draft of AC announcement
regarding TAG's last call expectations/thoughts and relation to AC
meeting feedback.
[9] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/webarch-20030626.html
[10] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Conversations
2.2 Findings (20 mins)
See also: [11]findings.
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
Next steps on these findings:
* [12]Client handling of MIME headers; see [13]summary of comments.
1. Action SW 2003/06/23: Talk to Voice Browser WG about proposed
text, then bring back to TAG.
2. Completed action IJ 2003/06/16: Add to draft finding
discussion about servers not guessing header information
(e.g., charset). Completed in 25 June draft of finding.
3. Completed aaction IJ 2003/06/23: Revise finding based on
discussion of 23 June TAG teleconf. ([14]Done)
4. Next steps for this finding?
* [15]How should the problem of identifying ID semantics in XML
languages be addressed in the absence of a DTD?
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0099.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0071.html
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDSemantics-32.html
The TAG does not expect to discuss the following at this meeting:
* [16]URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST; see
[17]summary of comments. See also [18]comments from Larry
Masinter.
+ [19]whenToUseGet-7
o Next step for [20]revised draft finding?
o Action IJ 2003/06/23: Incorporate a sentence about scope
based on LM comments.
* Action CL 2003/06/02: Make available a draft finding on
content/presentation.
* Action SW 2003/06/02: Continue work on and make available a draft
finding related to the opacity of URIs.
* Action IJ 2003/06/09: Turn [21]TB apple story into a finding.
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet-20030509.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0099.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0104.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#whenToUseGet-7
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7-20020610.html
[21] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/04/30/AppleWA
2.3 Issues the TAG intends to discuss (45 mins)
The TAG expects to do a walk-through of the open and pending
[22]issues in order to determine:
1. Is this issue nearly closed?
2. Do we want to close this issue before going to last call?
3. Do we want to discuss this issue at the face-to-face meeting?
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html
* [23]URIEquivalence-15
+ SW proposal: Track RFC2396bis where [24]Tim Bray text has
been integrated. Comment within the IETF process. Move this
issue to pending state.
* [25]HTTPSubstrate-16
+ Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
to be excluded from RFC 3205
+ See [26]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
* [27]errorHandling-20
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
(1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
has been signaled. Due first week of March.
* [28]xlinkScope-23
+ Status report?
+ See [29]draft, and [30]SW message to CG chairs.
* [31]contentTypeOverride-24
+ Next step on finding "[32]Client handling of MIME headers"
+ [33]Speech Recognition Grammar Specification Version 1.0,
section [34]2.2.2 External Reference by URI
+ Completed action TB 2003/06/23: Ask www-tag for info about
security whole related to contentTypeOverride.
+ Completed action IJ 2003/06/23: Update finding based on
comments from 16, 23 June teleconfs. ([35]done)
* [36]contentPresentation-26
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space.
Due 3 March.
* [37]IRIEverywhere-27
+ Action CL 2003/04/07: Revised position statement on use of
IRIs. CL says to expect this by 21 April.
+ Action TBL 2003/04/28: Explain how existing specifications
that handle IRIs are inconsistent. [38]TBL draft not yet
available on www-tag.
+ See TB's[39]proposed step forward on IRI 27.
* [40]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
1. Connection to content negotiation?
2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
3. No actions associated / no owner.
* [41]binaryXML-30
+ Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
adding to survey.
+ Next steps to finding? See [42]summary from Chris.
* [43]metadataInURI-31
+ Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one. See [44]SW
proposal
+ See also [45]TB email on Apple Music Store and use of URI
schemes instead of headers
* [46]xmlIDSemantics-32
+ See [47]Chris Lilley draft finding.
Action NW 2003/05/05: Point Core WG to CL finding once made
public.
* [48]mixedUIXMLNamespace-33
* [49]xmlFunctions-34
+ Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
XML Core work. See [50]email from TimBL capturing some of the
issues.
* [51]RDFinXHTML-35
* [52]siteData-36
+ Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
* [53]abstractComponentRefs-37
+ See [54]issue description from David Orchard. Next steps?
+ Action DO 2003/06/23: Point Jonathan Marsh at options. Ask
them for their analysis.
* [55]putMediaType-38
[23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
[24] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0094.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0104
[31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect.html
[33] http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-grammar/
[34] http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-grammar/#S2.2.2
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect-20030625
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
[38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0074.html
[39] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
[42] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
[43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003May/0050.html
[45] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0151.html
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDSemantics-32.html
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#mixedUIXMLNamespace-33
[49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
[50] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html
[51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#RDFinXHTML-35
[52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
[53] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[54] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0089.html
[55] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#putMediaType-38
2.4 New issues?
The TAG does not expect to discuss new issues at this meeting.
1. [56]Summary from Stuart
[56] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jun/0055.html
2.5 Issues that have associated action items
* [57]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
desideratum ([58]RQ-23).
* [59]namespaceDocument-8
+ Action TB 2003/04/07: Prepare RDDL Note. Include in status
section that there is TAG consensus that RDDL is a suitable
format for representations of an XML namespace. Clean up
messy section 4 of RDDL draft and investigate and publish a
canonical mapping to RDF. See TB's [60]1 June version.
+ Action PC 2003/04/07: Prepare finding to answer this issue,
pointing to the RDDL Note. See [61]comments from Paul
regarding TB theses.
+ Refer to draft TAG [62]opinion from Tim Brayon the use of
URNs for namespace names.
o RF: Folks assume that because the specs say so, URNs
will be persisitent. But persistence is a function of
institutional commitment and frequency of use.
* [63]uriMediaType-9
+ IANA appears to have responded to the spirit of this draft
(see [64]email from Chris Lilley).What's required to close
this issue?
+ Action CL 2003/05/05: Propose CL's three changes to
registration process to Ned Freed. [What forum?]
[57] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
[58] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
[59] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
[60] http://www.tbray.org/tag/rddl/rddl3.html
[61] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0046.html
[62] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0003.html
[63] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
[64] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0302.html
3. Other actions
* Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ and PLH making
substantial progress on this; hope to have something to show in
May.
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2003/06/26 20:31:11 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 16:32:31 UTC