- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 17 Jun 2003 15:51:01 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
At their 16 June 2003 teleconference [1], the TAG accepted
the following issue.
_ Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/16-tag-summary.html
putMediaType-38 : Relation of HTTP PUT to GET, and whether client
headers to server are authoritative
Some scenarios that this issue concerns:
* Client PUTs representation to server without content type
information; what is proper server behavior?
* Client PUTs representation to server with content type
information, but server ignores. Is this architecturally
incorrect?
* Client PUTs representation to server with detectably
inconsistent content type information. What is proper server
behavior (e.g., signal error and not silently ignoring)?
Raised by, on behalf of
Julien Reschke
Concerning
Authority of client headers
Background and related
* contentTypeOverride-24
State (Raised, Accepted, Declined, Resolved, etc.)
* 6 May 2003 Raised
* 16 Jun 2003 Accepted
Discussion history
16 Jun 2003
Assigned to
None.
Resolution summary
None.
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 15:51:07 UTC