- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:11:34 -0800
- To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <jonathan@openhealth.org>, <ylafon@w3.org>, <distobj@acm.org>, <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
> The semantics of GET simply do not fit the needs of > knowledge retrieval about resources. GET is for getting > *representations* not descriptions, and any attempt to > make it do double duty will result in confusion. RDF is nothing more that one representation of a description. It seems eminently appropriate to use GET to retrieve RDF documents which represent knowledge about various resources. I see no real added value in trying to pretend that RDF is not a representation and creating a parallel HTTP universe.
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:12:18 UTC