- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 07:46:00 -0500
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>
The rddl:resource element could do couple of things html:a couldn't. First of all, it could contain itself. This is ruled out by the XHTML specification. Secondly, it could contain block-level elements like div and h1 and p, even entire sections. The a element only contains inline elements: <!-- content is %Inline; except that anchors shouldn't be nested --> <!ENTITY % a.content "(#PCDATA | %special; | %fontstyle; | %phrase; | %inline.forms; | %misc.inline;)*"> <!ELEMENT a %a.content;> <!ATTLIST a %attrs; %focus; charset %Charset; #IMPLIED type %ContentType; #IMPLIED name NMTOKEN #IMPLIED href %URI; #IMPLIED hreflang %LanguageCode; #IMPLIED rel %LinkTypes; #IMPLIED rev %LinkTypes; #IMPLIED shape %Shape; "rect" coords %Coords; #IMPLIED > I'm not sure how important this is, but it does mean this proposal is less flexible than RDDL1 -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Saturday, 15 February 2003 07:51:21 UTC