- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:50:08 -0600
- To: www-tag@w3.org
[Yes, this is really about the minutes!]
At 20:35 2003 02 10 -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/02/06-tag-summary
>--
In [1], there is a section that reads as follows:
xmlIDSemantics-32 : How should the problem of identifying ID semantics
in XML languages be addressed in the absence of a DTD?
Issues fragmentInXML-28 and xmlIDSemantics-32
[Ian]
TB: I think they are related. If you are solving the ID problem,
you need to also decide how to solve the frag id problem.
PC: I am willing to be owner of 32
On xmlProfiles-29
PC: Henry Thompson asks what the TAG wants to happen. They are looking
for more details than we have given them.
DC: Liam Quin has the ball on this; he has accepted this.
The link underneath "fragmentInXML-28" is to
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#xmlProfiles-29
So I'm wondering if the text or the link is wrong. As written,
it looks like TB is saying fragmentInXML-28 and xmlIDSemantics-32
are related, but I'm guessing the text is wrong and he means to
be saying that xmlProfiles-29 and xmlIDSemantics-32 are related
(to which I disagree, but I'm more interested in getting the minutes
accurate at this point).
paul
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:57:35 UTC