Re: [xmlProfiles-29] TAG recommendation for work on subset of XML 1.1 from Jonathan Borden on 2003-02-05 (www-tag@w3.org from February 2003)

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:53:50 -0500
To: <www-tag@w3.org>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <00b501c2cd15$a2b16fe0$7c01a8c0@ne.mediaone.net>

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

>
> I am unconvinced of the necessity for subsetting the language, as
> opposed to identifying a new conformance class alongside the two
> already provided ('validating' and 'non-validating').
>

I'm with Henry on this one. We really need "XML" to be a common point of
reference -- there doesn't seem to be anything else the collective "we" can
agree on.

Jonathan

Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 08:16:26 UTC