- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:00:52 -0600
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org, Max Froumentin <mf@w3.org>, Michel Suignard <michelsu@microsoft.com>
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 15:51, Chris Lilley wrote: [...] > It would be highly desirable for FOO used in an IRI and the hexified > version of FOO used in a URI to compare the same when comparing two > URIs. If this is not done, then IRI-URI is a one-way street. > > For this to work in any sensible manner, then clearly it is not enough > for FOO to compare the same as %ab%cd%ef. It also has to compare the > same as %AB%CD%EF and %Ab%cd%eF and .... Either that or everybody has to follow the convention to use upper-case in %xx escapes. Surely we could get that consistently deployed in the IRI-grokking world. Sender-makes-right is *much* cheaper here. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 17:02:00 UTC