- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:41:44 -0600
- To: 'Walden Mathews' <waldenm@optonline.net>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
There is: Don't Do This. On one hand, there are those who want to treat URIs like they are primary keys in a relational db where the application enforces integrity. The web architecture doesn't do that because it abhors central registries. Worse, the thing identified, the resource, is an abstraction. So what we have is a best practice and if one wants to practice what Dan referred to as 'anarchic scaling', that is as good as it gets. The nit is the Semantic Web and the use of URIs in RDF. That architecture has to take care of itself because the web arch has nothing to offer for enforcing unique identifiers. len From: Walden Mathews [mailto:waldenm@optonline.net] : The confusion: one doesn't know what a resource is, : so ambiguity creeps in right there, typically confusion : of representation and resource. : You make a good point. It has less to do with confusion between representation and resource, though, and more to do with the essential inscrutibility of resources. Why be so precise about something that can't be nailed down anyhow? It seems like using a micrometer to measure a ditch. But I think somewhere there is a valid Best Practice lurking, and we're off the subject now.
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2003 09:43:12 UTC