- From: Walden Mathews <waldenm@optonline.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 20:42:03 -0500
- To: algermissen@acm.org
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
So then the Best Practice would be "don't use URIs ambiguously"... whatever "use" means. It still sounds the same to me. Since identifiers exist for the purpose of eliminating ambiguity, and URIs are just a class of identifier, is it really necessary to exhort people to use them for their intended purpose, i.e., to use them "un- ambiguously"? (Is that a rephrasing of your point, Len?) Walden ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Algermissen" <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com> To: "Walden Mathews" <waldenm@optonline.net> Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>; <www-tag@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:30 PM Subject: Re: 2.3 URI Ambiguity : Walden Mathews wrote: : > It's not clear that "URI ambiguity" is : > actually observable. : : From a lurker: : : Would it help to rename the issue "URI usage ambiguity", thus emphasizing : that URIs are never ambiguous but that they way they are used might be? : : Jan : : : : Again, the examples... : > : > Walden : : -- : Jan Algermissen http://www.topicmapping.com : Consultant & Programmer http://www.gooseworks.org : : __________ NOD32 1.568 (20031202) Information __________ : : This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System. : http://www.nod32.com : :
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2003 20:42:27 UTC