Re: ACTION completed: redraw diasgram of URI, resource, representation

Ian,

I appreciate the "start simple" strategy.  I hope the surrounding
context for the diagram will make it clear that while some basic
relationships are depicted, the "arity" of those relationships is not.
On the other hand, a diagram with one Resource, many URI
and many Representations would still be "pretty simple".

Other concepts, such as redirection, distributed containment,
etc., definitely deserve their own pictorial space.

Thanks,
Walden


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
To: "Walden Mathews" <waldenm@optonline.net>
Cc: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>; <www-tag@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: ACTION completed: redraw diasgram of URI, resource,
representation


> On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 14:40, Walden Mathews wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
>
> > Same resource.  There's no constraint that a Resource can have only
> > one identifier.
> >
> > For yet another diagram, it could also be illuminating to show two
> > Resources at the same moment in time sharing a representation.
>
> Right.
>
> I think we should start with the very simplest diagram
> first, then add pieces as we generalize (more than one
> representation, more than one URI, details of what
> constitutes a respresentation, etc.).
>
>  _ Ian
>
>
> > -- 
> > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> > Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
>
>

Received on Monday, 4 August 2003 20:37:53 UTC