Re: Grinding to a halt on Issue 27.

Joshua Allen wrote:
>>No, it's not. Namespaces clearly specifies that they are to be
>>differentiated based on string comparison. We know that IRIs will be 
>>strings. We can safely have a dependency on them, it'll never break
>>the spec. People using IRIs too early may get breakage, but otherwise 
>>everything will be fine.
> 
> This dance of "strcmp for namespaces and canonicalization for anyUri"
> has led to a status quo that is buggy and ambiguous, particularly for
> any non-trivial scenario.

Could you exemplify more clearly?

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 10:21:37 UTC