- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:19:31 -0700
- To: "'Paul Grosso'" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>
whoops. I guess that would make that would make option #4 somewhat less appealing. Thanks, I'll make sure to change the summary. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-tag-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of > Paul Grosso > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 7:16 AM > To: www-tag@w3.org > Subject: XPointer [was: First Draft of summary of TAG issue > abstractComponentRefs-37] > > > > At 21:59 2003 04 09 -0700, dorchard@bea wrote: > > >4. Use full XPointer. The sample URI is > >http://airline.wsdl/ticketagent/#xmlns((w=http://schemas.xmls > oap.org/wsdl/)x > >pointer(//w:portType[@name="TicketAgent"]/w:operation[@name=" > listFlights"]/w > >:input[@name="listFlightsRequest"]) > > > >Pros: > >- re-use XPointer syntax, which is a rec > > No, it [1] is not. > > It is not even at Last Call yet, and there is no currently > existing working group responsible for working on it. > > paul > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xptr-xpointer-20021219/ > >
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2003 12:44:01 UTC