www-tag@w3.org from September 2002 by date

Tuesday, 1 October 2002

Re: Links are links Paul Prescod

Monday, 30 September 2002

Re: Lessons from the RSS and HLink wars Simon St.Laurent
Lessons from the RSS and HLink wars Paul Prescod
Re: Links are links Roy T. Fielding
RE: A modest hyperlinking proposal Didier PH Martin
Re: A modest hyperlinking proposal Jeni Tennison
Re: Links are links Jeni Tennison
RE: A modest hyperlinking proposal Micah Dubinko
Re: FW: A modest hyperlinking proposal Jeni Tennison
Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? Simon St.Laurent
FW: A modest hyperlinking proposal Micah Dubinko
Re: two failings of XLink Paul Prescod

Saturday, 28 September 2002

Re: two failings of XLink Paul Prescod

Monday, 30 September 2002

Links are links Paul Prescod
RE: two failings of XLink Didier PH Martin
Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? Norman Walsh
Re: two failings of XLink Norman Walsh
Re: two failings of XLink Norman Walsh
Re: two failings of XLink Norman Walsh
Re: Hypertext; for machine or humans? Norman Walsh
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
Some comments on WD-webarch-20020830 Daniel Dardailler
Hypertext; for machine or humans? Mark Baker

Sunday, 29 September 2002

Re: two failings of XLink Norman Walsh

Saturday, 28 September 2002

RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? Eric van der Vlist
RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? Didier PH Martin
RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? Eric van der Vlist
Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? Jeni Tennison
Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? Jeni Tennison
RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? Didier PH Martin
RE: two failings of XLink Didier PH Martin
RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? Didier PH Martin
Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document Brian McBride
Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? Jeni Tennison
Re: Is XHTML a dead end? Eric van der Vlist
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
Hlink, CSS anyone? Eric van der Vlist
RE: two failings of XLink David Orchard
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: two failings of XLink Paul Grosso

Friday, 27 September 2002

RE: two failings of XLink Didier PH Martin
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
Re: two failings of XLink Paul Grosso
Re: generic uselessness (was Re: two failings of XLink) Jeni Tennison
Re: two failings of XLink Ann Navarro
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
RE: two failings of XLink Micah Dubinko
Re: two failings of XLink Tim Bray
Re: two failings of XLink Ann Navarro
Re: two failings of XLink Ann Navarro
Re: two failings of XLink Norman Walsh
RE: two failings of XLink Didier PH Martin
Re: two failings of XLink Ann Navarro
Re: two failings of XLink Ann Navarro
Re: Is XHTML a dead end? Eric van der Vlist
RE: two failings of XLink Didier PH Martin
generic uselessness (was Re: two failings of XLink) Simon St.Laurent
Re: two failings of XLink Ann Navarro
Re: two failings of XLink Norman Walsh
Re: Is XHTML a dead end? Tim Bray
Re: XLink: the architectural issue Norman Walsh
Re: Is XHTML a dead end? Tim Bray
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
Re: two failings of XLink Ann Navarro
Re: Is XHTML a dead end? Eric van der Vlist
Re: two failings of XLink Norman Walsh
Re: two failings of XLink Tim Bray
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
Re: two failings of XLink Micah Dubinko
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Mike Champion
Re: two failings of XLink Tim Bray
Re: two failings of XLink Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
Re: Is XHTML a dead end? Tim Bray
Re: two failings of XLink Ann Navarro
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
Re: two failings of XLink Tim Bray
RE: Is XHTML a dead end? Eric van der Vlist
RE: Is XHTML a dead end? Eric van der Vlist
Re: two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: two failings of XLink Norman Walsh
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: two failings of XLink Norman Walsh
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
Re: Minutes (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) Ian B. Jacobs
Minutes (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) Simon St.Laurent
RE: Is XHTML a dead end? Dare Obasanjo
RE: Is XHTML a dead end? Didier PH Martin
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Tim Bray
RE: Is XHTML a dead end? Eric van der Vlist
RE: Is XHTML a dead end? Eric van der Vlist
RE: Is XHTML a dead end? Didier PH Martin
Re: two failings of XLink Eric van der Vlist
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Ann Navarro
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Norman Walsh
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
RE: XLink+HLink is one story not two Dare Obasanjo
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: two failings of XLink Jeni Tennison
RE: two failings of XLink Didier PH Martin
Re: two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: XLink+HLink is one story not two Steven Pemberton
XLink+HLink is one story not two Steven Pemberton
Re: XLink: the architectural issue Eric van der Vlist
Re: two failings of XLink Micah Dubinko
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold

Thursday, 26 September 2002

XLink: the architectural issue Steven Pemberton
Re: Is XHTML a dead end? Steven Pemberton
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Steven Pemberton
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Steven Pemberton
Re: Is XHTML a dead end? Mike Champion
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Steven Pemberton
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Svgdeveloper@aol.com
RE: Is XHTML a dead end? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Is XHTML a dead end? Didier PH Martin
Re: Is XHTML a dead end? Svgdeveloper@aol.com
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Steven Pemberton
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Paul Prescod
Is XHTML a dead end? Svgdeveloper@aol.com
RE: two failings of XLink Didier PH Martin
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Steven Pemberton
Concrete Hyperlinking Suggestion (was: Suggested alternate wordin g re XLink) Micah Dubinko
Re: two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
RE: Suggested alternate wording re XLink Didier PH Martin
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Ann Navarro
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Didier PH Martin
Re: two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: Suggested alternate wording re XLink Mike Champion
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Ann Navarro
Re: two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: two failings of XLink Svgdeveloper@aol.com
Suggested alternate wording re XLink Tim Bray
Re: Sections (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) Simon St.Laurent
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Ann Navarro
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Robin Berjon
Re: Sections (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Robin Berjon
Re: two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Svgdeveloper@aol.com
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: two failings of XLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Champion, Mike
Sections (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) Simon St.Laurent
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Svgdeveloper@aol.com
RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink David Orchard
Re: About XLink discussion Ian B. Jacobs
RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Didier PH Martin
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Svgdeveloper@aol.com
two failings of XLink Simon St.Laurent
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Ann Navarro
RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Didier PH Martin
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Shane McCarron
Re: About XLink discussion Ann Navarro
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Svgdeveloper@aol.com
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink David Carlisle
About XLink discussion Tim Bray
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Shane McCarron
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Mike Champion
Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Steven Pemberton
RE: TAG feedback on Namespaces 1.1 Last Call Didier PH Martin
RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Didier PH Martin

Wednesday, 25 September 2002

TAG feedback on Namespaces 1.1 Last Call Tim Bray

Thursday, 26 September 2002

Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Simon St.Laurent
TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink Norman Walsh

Wednesday, 25 September 2002

Comments on 20020830 architecture document... Graham Klyne
FW: Danish case on deep linking Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document Jonathan Borden

Tuesday, 24 September 2002

Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Tim Berners-Lee
Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 23 September 2002

Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Stefan Eissing

Friday, 20 September 2002

RDF concepts, section 2.4.2 Graham Klyne

Sunday, 22 September 2002

Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document Jonathan Borden

Friday, 20 September 2002

Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document Tim Bray
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Bill de hÓra
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Jonathan Borden
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc [RDF info] Jonathan Borden
Re: More research on resources, think it's all here Jonathan Borden
RE: More research on resources, think it's all here Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document Tim Berners-Lee
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc [RDF info] Bill de hÓra
More research on resources, think it's all here Tim Bray
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc [RDF info] Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc [RDF info] Tim Bray
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Roy T. Fielding
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Michael Mealling
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Williams, Stuart
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Williams, Stuart
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Tim Bray
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Michael Mealling
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Miles Sabin
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Michael Mealling
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Michael Mealling
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Bill de hÓra
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Miles Sabin
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Michael Mealling
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Bill de hÓra
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Williams, Stuart
expansion on: Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Jonathan Borden
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Jonathan Borden
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Graham Klyne

Thursday, 19 September 2002

Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Roy T. Fielding
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Roy T. Fielding
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Dan Connolly
Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document Graham Klyne
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc David Orchard
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Michael Mealling
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Tim Bray
[Agenda] 24-25 Sep TAG face-to-face meeting agenda Ian B. Jacobs
RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Norman Walsh
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Norman Walsh
Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document Brian McBride
My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc Tim Bray

Wednesday, 18 September 2002

Re: draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) Erik Wilde
Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document Tim Berners-Lee
Re: Some questions on HLink Steven Pemberton

Tuesday, 17 September 2002

Re: Some questions on HLink Masayasu Ishikawa

Monday, 16 September 2002

Lightly-edited IRC log of TAG Sep 16 telecon Tim Bray
Some questions on HLink Tim Bray
Re: How to Version XML Applications Tim Bray
Re: How to Version XML Applications Norman Walsh

Saturday, 14 September 2002

Re: How to Version XML Applications Anthony B. Coates
remapping (was Re: Announcing HLink: rationale) Simon St.Laurent
Re: Announcing HLink: rationale Tim Bray

Friday, 13 September 2002

Re: How to Version XML Applications noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: Announcing HLink: rationale Steven Pemberton
Re: How to Version XML Applications Norman Walsh
RE: How to Version XML Applications Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: How to Version XML Applications noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: How to Version XML Applications Norman Walsh
RE: How to Version XML Applications Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: How to Version XML Applications Dare Obasanjo
Re: How to Version XML Applications Norman Walsh
Re: How to Version XML Applications Norman Walsh
Re: Announcing HLink: rationale Norman Walsh
Re: Announcing HLink: rationale Paul Grosso
Announcing HLink: rationale Steven Pemberton
Action PC 2002/09/09 Paul Cotton

Thursday, 12 September 2002

Re: How to Version XML Applications noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) Chris Lilley
Re: How to Version XML Applications Anthony B. Coates
Re: How to Version XML Applications Anthony B. Coates
[Agenda] 16 September TAG teleconf Williams, Stuart
RE: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web David Orchard
RE: How to Version XML Applications David Orchard

Wednesday, 11 September 2002

Re: How to Version XML Applications Tim Bray
Re: How to Version XML Applications Tim Bray
RE: How to Version XML Applications Dare Obasanjo
Re: How to Version XML Applications Tim Bray
RE: How to Version XML Applications Dare Obasanjo
Re: How to Version XML Applications Anthony B. Coates
Re: How to Version XML Applications Norman Walsh
RE: How to Version XML Applications Dare Obasanjo
RE: How to Version XML Applications Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: How to Version XML Applications Norman Walsh
RE: How to Version XML Applications Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: How to Version XML Applications Norman Walsh
Re: How to Version XML Applications Anthony B. Coates
URIs and web services Paul Prescod
[Minutes] 09 Sep 2002 TAG teleconf Norman Walsh
Re: How to Version XML Applications Tim Bray
Re: How to Version XML Applications Norman Walsh
How to Version XML Applications Joseph Reagle
Re: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web Norman Walsh
Re: [Minutes] 30 Aug 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc, xlinkScope-23, deepLinking-25, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) Dan Connolly
Re: Architecture or process? Dan Connolly
Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) Jonathan Borden
Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Graham Klyne
Architecture or process? Graham Klyne
Re: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web Graham Klyne
Re: [Minutes] 30 Aug 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc, xlinkScope-23, deepLinking-25, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) Graham Klyne
Re: suggested replacement text "circle or spline" Graham Klyne
Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) Jean-Jacques Moreau

Tuesday, 10 September 2002

Re: Is SMTP really part of the Web Architecture? Paul Prescod
Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) Elliotte Rusty Harold

Monday, 9 September 2002

Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) Mark Baker
Re: Micropayments and principle 4 Tim Bray
Re: Is SMTP really part of the Web Architecture? Mark Nottingham
Re: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web Joseph Reagle
RE: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Williams, Stuart
Re: Is SMTP really part of the Web Architecture? Mark Baker
Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) Dan Connolly
RE: Micropayments and principle 4 Bill de hÓra
Is SMTP really part of the Web Architecture? Elliotte Rusty Harold
Micropayments and principle 4 Elliotte Rusty Harold
Comments on Architectural Principles draft Brian E Carpenter

Sunday, 8 September 2002

Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Larry Masinter
defining 'URI' Larry Masinter
work from home we will help you. pele

Saturday, 7 September 2002

Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Roy T. Fielding
Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? MURATA Makoto

Friday, 6 September 2002

Re: my web, your web, The Web Jos De_Roo
my web, your web, The Web Dan Connolly
URIEquivalence-15: Identifier Scope and Resource Identity Dan Connolly
Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Tim Bray
Re: draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) Chris Lilley
Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Tim Berners-Lee
Re: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web Tim Berners-Lee
Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Mark Baker
Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Tim Bray
Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Tim Berners-Lee
Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Tim Bray
"absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) Dan Connolly
RE: draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) Paul Cotton

Thursday, 5 September 2002

draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) David Hopwood
Summary of TAG activity from 7 August to 3 Sep 2002 Ian B. Jacobs
Social problems and technical fixes Etan Wexler
RE: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Dan Kohn
RE: Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use Paul Cotton
Re: Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use Chris Lilley
Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Chris Lilley
Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Chris Lilley
Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Chris Lilley
Re: Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use Chris Lilley
RE: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Bullard, Claude L (Len)

Wednesday, 4 September 2002

Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Mark Nottingham
RE: URI denumerability Julian Reschke
RE: URI denumerability Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: URI denumerability Matthew Wilson
RE: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web Joseph Reagle
Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Mark Nottingham
[Agenda] 9 September TAG teleconf Ian B. Jacobs
Re: Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use Joseph Reagle
Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? Larry Masinter
Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use Ian B. Jacobs
Re: suggested replacement text "circle or spline" Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 3 September 2002

RE: Architectural issue: component specifications (was More on xl ink- 23) Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" Anthony B. Coates
RE: URI denumerability Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: working draft on architectural principles Mark Baker
RE: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wid e Web" Williams, Stuart
RE: Call for Review: XML-Signature XPath Filter 2.0 DPawson@rnib.org.uk
Re: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" Paul Prescod

Monday, 2 September 2002

Re: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" Anthony B. Coates
Re: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" Anthony B. Coates
Deep Linking draft Tim Bray
RE: archdoc, section 2 Julian Reschke

Sunday, 1 September 2002

RE: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" Danny Ayers
Re: archdoc, section 2 Tim Bray
archdoc, section 2 Julian Reschke
Re: suggested replacement text "circle or spline" Tim Bray
Re: Using URIs as language instead of as protocol element Tim Bray
Re: working draft on architectural principles Tim Bray

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 21:52:24 UTC