[Agenda] 21 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf

Hello,

The agenda is available as HTML [1] and as text below

  - Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/10/21-tag

-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

=============


    W3C | TAG | Previous: 7 Oct teleconference | Next: 28
    Oct

         Agenda for 21 October 2002 TAG teleconference

    Nearby: Teleconference details ? issues list ?
    www-tag archive

    Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change
    after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of
    this week.

1. Administrative (30min)

     1. Confirm Chair (SW) and Scribe (IJ)
     2. Roll call.
     3. Accept 7 Oct teleconference minutes
     4. Accept this agenda
     5. Next meeting? Proposed 28 Oct.

   1.2 Completed actions?

     1. Action RF 2002/09/25: On the topic of revising
        RFC2396, indicate to the TAG what the relevant
        IETF fora are for input. Done: uri@w3org is the
        forum. RF will send information there.

   1.3 Meeting planning

     1. TAG presentation at AC meeting.
          1. Confirm TAG slot at AC meeting (Weds pm on
             agenda (Member-only)).
          2. Report of TAG activity (presenter?)
                o News since previous AC meeting.
                o Assessment after one year of existence.
                  Action PC: Respond to IJ's summary of
                  process issues (TAG-only) from AB
                  regarding TAG charter. Also, clarify
                  meaning of "short-term resolutions" in
                  charter.
                o Top three issues (see SW's email to
                  TAG).
          3. Arch document presentation (presenter?)

2. Technical (60min)

   2.1 Findings in progress, architecture document

    See also: findings.
     1. Findings in progress:
          1. deepLinking-25
               1. TB 2002/09/09: Revise "Deep Linking" in
                  light of 9 Sep minutes. Status of
                  finding?
          2. Internet Media Type registration,
             consistency of use.
                o Having reviewed IJ's proposed changes
                  to finding and reply from Reagle. Does
                  this change close issue
                  RFC3023Charset-21?
     2. Findings versioning
          1. SW 2002/09/09: Discuss with IJ versioning of
             findings. Pending. SW and IJ have discussed
             latest accepted v. latest draft.
     3. Architecture document
          1. Draft schedule for next arch document:
               1. 28 Oct: TAG review of whatever current
                  draft is starts.
               2. 4 Nov: TAG closes issues about draft.
               3. 11 Nov: Final discussion, request to
                  publish.
               4. 13 Nov: Next TR draft published.
          2. Finish discussion of feedback on arch
             document.:
               1. Summary of comments
               2. Comments from Graham Klyne
               3. Comments from Daniel Dardailler
             Action IJ 2002/10/17 (from Chair): Summarize
             these comments for the TAG.
          3. Action DC 2002/08/12: Ask www-tag for
             volunteers to work with TAG (and possibly
             IETF) on HTTP URI stuff; CRISP. [This action
             supersedes the previous action: Ask IESG
             when IETF decided not to use HTTP URIs to
             name protocols.] Sent. Mark Baker and DC
             have a draft that is awaiting further
             attention.
          4. Action RF 2002/09/25: Propose a rewrite of a
             principle (rationale -> principle ->
             constraint) to see whether the TAG prefers
             this approach. It was suggested that the
             example be about HTTP/REST, as part of
             section 4.
          5. Action TBL 2002/09/25: Propose text on
             information hiding. (From 24-25 Sep TAG ftf:
             "The principle of information-hiding is
             contrary to global identifiers....Shall we
             put in the document something about
             information hiding/independent design of
             orthogonal specs? You should should not be
             able to write an xpath to peek into http
             headers....")
          6. Action CL 2002/09/25: Redraft section 3,
             incorporating CL's existing text and TB's
             structural proposal (see minutes of 25 Sep
             ftf meeting on formats).
          7. Action NW 2002/09/25: Write some text for a
             section on namespaces (docs at namespace
             URIs, use of RDDL-like thing).

   2.2 Priority issues

     1. xlinkScope-23
          1. Action SW: Draw up a neutral proposal (due
             21 Oct) summarizing threads and debating
             points on xlinkScope-23. Pending.
     2. namespaceDocument-8
          1. Action TB 2002/09/24: Revise the RDDL
             document to use RDF rather than XLink. Goal
             of publication as W3C Note.
          2. Action NW 2002/09/25: Write some text for an
             Arch Doc section on namespaces (docs at
             namespace URIs, use of RDDL-like thing).
     3. contentPresentation-26
          1. Action CL 2002/09/24: Draft text on the
             principle of separation of content and
             presentation for the Arch Doc.
     4. rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
          1. Action DC 2002/09/24: Write to Schema WG to
             say that TAG is interested in progress on
             this issue. Copy Jonathan Borden and Brian
             McBride.
     5. uriMediaType-9:
           + Action DC 2002/08/30: Write a draft Internet
             Draft based on this finding (Deadline 30
             Sep). This action probably subsumes the
             action on TBL to get a reply from the IETF
             on the TAG finding.
     6. Status of URIEquivalence-15. Relation to
        Character Model of the Web (chapter 4)? See text
        from TimBL on URI canonicalization and email from
        Martin in particular. See more comments from
        Martin.
          1. CL 2002/08/30: Ask Martin Duerst for
             suggestions for good practice regarding URI
             canonicalization issues, such as %7E v. &7e
             and suggested use of lower case. At 16 Sep
             meeting, CL reports pending; action to send
             URI to message to TAG.
     7. Status of discussions with WSA WG about
        SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query strings?
           + DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this
             issue (bindings, query strings and schemas)
             to ensure that it's on their radar. See
             discussions from 9 Sep TAG teleconf.

   2.3 New issues?

      * Use of frags in SVG v. in XML
           + Action DC 2002/09/26: Describe this issue in
             more detail for the TAG
      * Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema,
        etc. from Tim Bray
      ________________________________________________


     Ian Jacobs, for TimBL
     Last modified: $Date: 2002/10/17 15:10:54 $

Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 11:37:45 UTC