- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 11:59:43 -0700
- To: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>
There has been some question about whether XHTML really needs multi-ended links. Frankly, this flabbergasted me, because whenever I'm out looking at web pages I see things that cry out for extended links. Here are some examples. Go to http://www.cisco.com, do a view source and look at the brutal javascript/form hack they use to "select the area" of the website you want to go to. That'd be nice & clean with a good XLink extended-link implementation. This is common (mis-)practice at dozens of big-company web sites. Go to financial news site TheStreet.com and check out a random story; the first one I popped up was http://www.thestreet.com/_tscs/tech/kcswanson/10046368.html - look at all those company names with the irritating parenthesis containing links to the quote, news, commentary, research, and analysis. Crying out for extended links. Got to a more bleeding-edge site like http://www.panopticon.com, which is trying to do cool menu mousovers; it doesn't work in 2 of the three browsers here on my mac, all of which are pretty standards-compliant. Do a "view source" and run away gibbering. If I were to invest another half-hour in this I could give another 40 or 50 examples. It seems to me that multi-ended links of the type provided by xlink:type="extended" is one of the single lowest-hanging fruits out there if you want to make the HTML a better place for designers, authors, and readers. -Tim
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 14:59:45 UTC