- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:40:28 -0400
- To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:28:03AM -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote: > In the old days we would have used URNs and moved on. Unfortunately now > we have the mess that are URI and these philosophical yet meaningless > debates will continually ebb and flow. I'm glad that at least now the > TAG has realized that the discussion isn't productive and even more is > inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. Well, although the TAG is putting the httpRange-14 issue behind them, they do seem pretty keen on dereferencable URI, which would seem to rule out URNs (until they're commonly dereferencable); http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#pr-describe-resource MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 14:39:22 UTC