- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:22:08 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@prescod.net] > Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:39 PM > To: Champion, Mike; www-tag@w3.org > Subject: Re: The case against URNs > > Roy claims somewhat pursasively that the Web as it exists today DOES > allow addressing of abstract resources. Let's put it this > way, would you > think it odd if you saw the following markup: > > <p>The <a href="http://www.w3.org">W3C</a> is an important <a > href="http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=organization&r=67">or > ganization</a> > and <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> is an > important service. > </p> I wouldn't, but I'm not a machine :-) A machine that doesn't understand the English meaning of the sentence can't know if it refers to the W3C itself or the W3C website. [Humming "Deja Vu" ....]
Received on Sunday, 6 October 2002 21:22:10 UTC