- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 15:08:07 -0700
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Simon St.Laurent wrote: >>>Why is it more important for XHTML to migrate in the direction of >>>generic XML rather than for generic XML to incorporate the linking >>>mechanism of XHTML 1.x? >> >>I don't accept that reformulation of what I said. > > You don't have to accept Mike's reformulation; I have a very hard time > seeing what you propose as anything other than Mike's description > regardless of your acceptance, and others will likely make up their own > minds depending on their background. OK, let's simplify. I said "Use XLink for XXX". Mike said "That's because it's generic XML". I say "No, because I think it's good design for XXX." Now I guess I could be lying. But I'm not. -Tim
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 18:08:09 UTC