- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 16:40:43 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
An agenda for the 7 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf is
available as HTML [1] and as text below.
- Ian
====================================================
[1]W3C [2]| TAG | Previous: [3]24-25 Sep ftf meeting | Next: 14 Oct
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/24-tag-summary
Agenda for 7 October 2002 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [4]Teleconference details · [5]issues list · [6]www-tag
archive
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
1. Administrative (15min)
1. Confirm Chair (SW) and Scribe (IJ)
2. Roll call.
3. Accept 24-25 Sep minutes
4. Accept this [7]agenda
5. Next meeting? Proposed 14 Oct.
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/10/07-tag
1.2 Completed actions?
1. TB 2002/09/24: Send a draft email to tag@w3.org regarding XML
namespaces 1.1 spec in last call (Done, then [8]email sent to
www-tag).
2. NW 2002/09/24: Draft an email (for TAG review) suggesting to the
HTML WG that XHTML 2.0 should use XLink for hyperlink
constructs,
or provide a technical explanation why that's not a good design
decision. (Done, then [9]email sent to www-tag).
3. Action IJ 2002/09/24: Report to plenary meeting organizers that
the TAG does not intend to have a ftf meeting at that time.
4. Action IJ 2002/09/24: Begin planning a meeting for Feb 2003 in
Boston.
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0185.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0183.html
1.3 Meeting planning
1. Action IJ, SW 2002/09/24: Compile list of process questions AB
postponed so that first TAG could answer.
2. Action IJ 2002/09/24: Find out more administrative information
about TAG ftf meeting in Nov 2002. [Pending]
3. Action SW 2002/09/24: Take to the mailing list the top three TAG
questions for the AC (for Nov 2002).
4. Action IJ 2002/09/24: Send email to Steve Bratt requesting
slot at
AC meeting for arch discussion, distinct from TAG reporting
slot.
Ask the AB if they agree to sharing slots at AC meeting.
[Pending]
2. Technical (75min)
2.2 Findings in progress, architecture document (30min)
See also: [10]findings.
1. Findings in progress:
1. [11]deepLinking-25
1. TB 2002/09/09: Revise "[12]Deep Linking" in light of
[13]9 Sep minutes. Status of finding?
2. [14]Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use.
o Having reviewed IJ's [15]proposed changes to
[16]finding
and [17]reply from Reagle. Does this change close
issue
[18]RFC3023Charset-21?
2. Findings versioning
1. SW 2002/09/09: Discuss with IJ versioning of findings.
Pending. SW and IJ have discussed latest accepted v. latest
draft.
3. [19]Architecture document
1. Draft schedule for next arch document:
1. 28 Oct: TAG review of whatever current draft is
starts.
2. 4 Nov: TAG closes issues about draft.
3. 11 Nov: Final discussion, request to publish.
4. 13 Nov: Next TR draft published.
2. Finish discussion of feedback on arch document.:
1. [20]Summary of comments
2. [21]Comments from Graham Klyne
3. [22]Comments from Daniel Dardailler
3. Action DC 2002/08/12: Ask www-tag for volunteers to
work with
TAG (and possibly IETF) on HTTP URI stuff; CRISP. [This
action supersedes the previous action: Ask IESG when IETF
[ decided not to use HTTP URIs to name protocols.] [23]Sent.
Awaiting reply.
4. Action TBL: 2002/07/15: Create a table of URI properties.
o Is this still relevant given current state of Arch
Document?
5. Action RF 2002/09/25: Propose a rewrite of a principle
(rationale -> principle -> constraint) to see whether
the TAG
prefers this approach. It was suggested that the example be
about HTTP/REST, as part of section 4.
6. Action TBL 2002/09/25: Propose text on information hiding.
7. Action CL 2002/09/25: Redraft section 3, incorporating CL's
existing text and TB's structural proposal (see [24]minutes
of 25 Sep ftf meeting on formats).
8. Action NW 2002/09/25: Write some text for a section on
namespaces (docs at namespace URIs, use of RDDL-like
thing).
9. Action RF 2002/09/25: On the topic of revising RFC2396,
indicate to the TAG what the relevant IETF fora are for
input.
[10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#deepLinking-25
[12] http://www.textuality.com/tag/DeepLinking.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/09-tag-summary
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0018.html
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0020
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#RFC3023Charset-21
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0813-archdoc
[20]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Sep/0179.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0182.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0339.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Aug/0196.html
[24] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/24-tag-summary.html#formats
2.3 Priority issues (45min)
1. [25]xlinkScope-23
1. Action CL 2002/08/30: Request that the HTML WG to publish
their recent work related to linking (through HTML CG,
WG, or
whatever works).
2. How do we move forward on this issue in light of input
since
ftf meeting?
2. [26]namespaceDocument-8
1. Action TB 2002/09/24: Revise the RDDL document to use RDF
rather than XLink. Goal of publication as W3C Note.
2. Action NW 2002/09/25: Write some text for an Arch Doc
section
on namespaces (docs at namespace URIs, use of RDDL-like
thing).
3. [27]contentPresentation-26
1. Action CL 2002/09/24: Draft text on the principle of
separation of content and presentation for the Arch Doc.
4. [28]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
1. Action DC 2002/09/24: Write to Schema WG to say that TAG is
interested in progress on this issue. Copy Jonathan Borden
and Brian McBride.
5. [29]uriMediaType-9:
+ Action DC 2002/08/30: Write a draft Internet Draft based on
this finding (Deadline 30 Sep). This action probably
subsumes
the action on TBL to get a reply from the IETF on the TAG
finding.
6. Status of [30]URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of
the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on [31]URI
canonicalization and [32]email from Martin in particular.
See more
[33]comments from Martin.
1. CL 2002/08/30: Ask Martin Duerst for suggestions for good
practice regarding URI canonicalization issues, such as %7E
v. &7e and suggested use of lower case. At [34]16 Sep
meeting, CL reports pending; action to send URI to
message to
TAG.
7. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query
strings?
+ DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this issue (bindings,
query strings and schemas) to ensure that it's on their
radar. See [35]discussions from 9 Sep TAG teleconf.
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xlinkScope-23
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#namespaceDocument-8
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#contentPresentation-26
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uriMediaType-9
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#URIEquivalence-15
[31] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#canonicalization
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002May/0161
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0275.html
[34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0127.html
[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0085
2.4 New issues?
* Use of frags in SVG v. in XML
+ Action DC 2002/09/26: Describe this issue in more
detail for
the TAG.
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs, for TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2002/10/02 20:33:30 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 16:40:45 UTC