Friday, 29 November 2002
- RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding
- RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments
- RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI
- RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI
- RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments
- RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI
- RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding
- RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding
- RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding
- RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI
- Re: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI
- Re: Generic link handling
- Posted draft of URI comparison finding
- RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI
Thursday, 28 November 2002
- Agenda for TAG Telcon 2nd December 2002
- Re: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI
- RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI
Wednesday, 27 November 2002
Thursday, 28 November 2002
Wednesday, 27 November 2002
- Re: Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata
- Re: Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata
- Cool titles don't change
- RE: Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata
- Re: Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata
Tuesday, 26 November 2002
- Re: The RDDL challenge
- RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: binary XML
- Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata
- Re: The RDDL challenge
- Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata
- Re: Updated SOAP HTTP GET binding document
- RE: Updated SOAP HTTP GET binding document
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
Monday, 25 November 2002
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- [Minutes] 25 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (Action item review)
- TAG election started; nomination period until 23 Dec 2002
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- [Minutes] 18 Nov 2002 TAG ftf meeting
- RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset
- Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata
- Re: My action on namespaces
- rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 affects WSDL too
- Fwd: IAB discussions & IRIs
- Fwd: RE: IAB discussions & IRIs
- RE: IRI-Everywhere
- proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata
Friday, 22 November 2002
Saturday, 23 November 2002
- The RDDL challenge
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
Friday, 22 November 2002
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- RE: Let's get some principles nailed down
- RE: Let's get some principles nailed down
- [www-tag] <none>
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- A few comments on "Guidelines for the use of XML within IETF Protocols"
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- RE: Let's get some principles nailed down
- RE: IRI-Everywhere
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
Wednesday, 20 November 2002
- Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF
- RE: IRI-Everywhere
- Re: [Agenda] 25 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, URIEquivalence-15, namespaceDocument-8)
- RE: proposed TAG issue: future web architecture
- Re: proposed TAG issue: future web architecture
- [Agenda] 25 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, URIEquivalence-15, namespaceDocument-8)
Tuesday, 19 November 2002
- proposed TAG issue: future web architecture
- Re: xlinkScope-23 & RDF
- xlinkScope-23 & RDF
- Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF
- Re: RDDL: Here is some 'real' RDF was: Re: minor RDF tax
- Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF
- Re: Let's make sure we've got nails and not screws...
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- Re: Let's make sure we've got nails and not screws...
- Let's make sure we've got nails and not screws... (Re: Let's get some principles nailed down)
Monday, 18 November 2002
- RE: IRI-Everywhere
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- XML protocols principles (was Re: Let's get some principles nailed down)
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- Re: Let's get some principles nailed down
- REST Interaction principles
- Let's get some principles nailed down
- Commentary on 15 Nov Arch Doc WD
Sunday, 17 November 2002
- Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF
- RDDL: Here is some 'real' RDF was: Re: minor RDF tax
- Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF
- RDDL/RDF new proposal
- Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF
- Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF
- minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF
Saturday, 16 November 2002
Friday, 15 November 2002
Thursday, 14 November 2002
Wednesday, 13 November 2002
- RE: IRI-Everywhere
- Archive approval system for this list
- draft-duerst-iri-02 published
- RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments
- RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- what should RDDL/RDF look like?
- RE: [Publication] 29 Oct 2002 Arch Doc
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- RDF and mixed content
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- [Publication] 12 Nov 2002 Architecture Document
Tuesday, 12 November 2002
- Re: [Publication] 29 Oct 2002 Arch Doc
- Re: RDF/XML (was Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF)
- Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- IRI-Everywhere
- Re: My action on namespaces
- Re: RDF/XML (was Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF)
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- RDF/XML (was Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF)
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action on namespaces
- Re: My action on namespaces
- Re: My action on namespaces
- Re: My action on namespaces
- Re: My action on namespaces
- Another RDDL/RDF proposal
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
Monday, 11 November 2002
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- [Minutes] 11 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (IRIEverywhere-27, Arch Doc, xlinkScope-23)
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- RE: [Publication] 29 Oct 2002 Arch Doc
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action on namespaces
- My action on namespaces
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF
Sunday, 10 November 2002
Friday, 8 November 2002
Thursday, 7 November 2002
Wednesday, 6 November 2002
Tuesday, 5 November 2002
- Re: [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML
- Re: Determining what a URI identifies
- Re: [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML
- Re: [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML
- Re: [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML
Monday, 4 November 2002
- Findings versioning policy
- [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML
- [Minutes] 4 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (query/schema consistency, fragments in XML, Arch Doc)
- Re: Determining what a URI identifies
- Re: Determining what a URI identifies
- Re: [Fwd: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML)]
- Re: Determining what a URI identifies
- Re: Determining what a URI identifies
- RE: Determining what a URI identifies
- Action RF: rewrite of a principle
- Re: Determining what a URI identifies
- Re: Determining what a URI identifies
- Re: Determining what a URI identifies
Sunday, 3 November 2002
Friday, 1 November 2002
- Re: [Publication] 29 Oct 2002 Arch Doc
- Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML)
- Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML)
- Arch Doc: was Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML)
- Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML)
- RE: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces)
- Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces)
- Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML)
- Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML)
- Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML)