- From: <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 17:40:35 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Jeremy,
On 27/05/2002 17:13:18 Jeremy Carroll wrote:
[...]
> My main architectural level concern is what will happen with XML
> Namespaces 1.1.
> It would be odd for RDF (and a number of other specs) to be using IRIs
> (or something similar but not quite - IRI draft is not cooked) while the
> core use of URIs in XML was still US-ASCII only.
We must distinguish between XML Namespaces, where the situation is, at
the very least, ambiguous, and XML itself. The latter unambiguously
permits UTF-8 URIs.
> I hope that a number of specs that are at or near last call including:
> - charmod
> - XML 1.1, XML Namespaces 1.1
> - RDF *
>
> will all show a consistent approach to URI refs and their
> internationalization.
Agreed.
Misha
[...]
------------------------------------------------------------- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Monday, 27 May 2002 13:10:03 UTC