- From: Roy Hoobler <rhoobler@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 00:29:53 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Received on Monday, 13 May 2002 02:18:28 UTC
>From a 'business' perspective, the idea of 'safe' methods sounds very good. I have two questions: 1. Souldn't GET always be stateless? I think it is a good idea that when requesting a resource via GET, no other session information can be presumed available? From your descussion and other's, this makes a lot of sense. 2. Can UDDI cover some of the problems with SOAP's securtity and protocals. SOAP is a good HTTP protocal and UDDI, doesn't restrict using SOAP. However, with UDDI in place, servers could use UDDI for security, before accessing the SOAP request. That would make UDDI worth-while for a lot of people that currently don't need it. Roy
Received on Monday, 13 May 2002 02:18:28 UTC