- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 08:35:12 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-tag@w3.org
If you will permit me, I have a few comments on the document. For the moment, I'll limit myself to section 1 and section 1.1. Depending on the reception of these comments, I may have more. Section 1. Introduction If the desire is to bind a web service to HTTP GET, then arguably this is a web service binding not a SOAP binding. In fact, the Web Service Description Language already includes a number of bindings including HTTP GET & POST Binding defined in section 4 <http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl#_http>. Section 3 of this document describes the SOAP binding, and section 5 describes a MIME binding. Perhaps this input could be reformulated as a delta to the existing WSDL document? Section 1.1 Requirements "The mapping from SOAP HTTP POST Binding to HTTP GET and back shall be automatable.". This concerns me a bit as HTTP GET is supposed to be limited to "safe" operations - see http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html#sec9.1.1. In general, this determination is not automatable. Also, the WSDL bindings for the various protocols contain a number of protocol specific elements that influence the mapping between the abstract definition of the sevice and the formulation of bits that flow across the wire. - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 13:13:52 UTC