W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Updated SOAP HTTP GET binding document

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 22:58:59 -0400
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020506225859.E28314@www.markbaker.ca>
Cool.

I assume that this was your response to my question about how which
bindings should be used;

"There are a variety of other HTTP methods and common method prefixes
that could be mapped. For example, a setStockPrice SOAP Method could be
mapped to the HTTP PUT method."

Rather than "could" (which I interpret as "MAY"), I'd like to see a
"SHOULD" in there.  Otherwise you'll have people sending getFoo()
methods over PUT, setFoo() methods over POST, etc..

I believe that saying this is *very* important; IMO, more important
than doing a GET binding.

Thanks.

MB

On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 07:33:50PM -0700, David Orchard wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ws-uri.html
> 
> I decided to get rid of the dates considering that this is really an
> "editors" draft and I didn't want lots of versions floating around.
> 
> Numerous updates based upon discussions at the TAG F2F, and comments from
> Larry Masinter and Mark Baker.
> 
> Cheers,
> dave

-- 
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 22:51:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:51 UTC