- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 19:13:14 +0100
- To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <www-tag@w3.org>
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of > Paul Prescod > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 7:05 PM > To: Julian Reschke; www-tag@w3.org > Subject: Re: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web) > > > Julian Reschke wrote: > > > >... > > > > A similar problem arises when trying to get browsers to play with WebDAV > > servers. Users expect a link to a resource to perform a "GET". > However, what > > if you want to point somebody to the "folder view" of a > collection of HTTP > > resources (as defined by WebDAV)? As the PROPFINDable > information doesn't > > have it's own URI (now if somebody has a proposal how to make > WebDAV more > > GET-friendly, I'd like to hear that :-)), there's no simple (and no > > standardized way) to do this. > > >From my point of view, that's an example of the nastiness that happens > when you forget how central GET is. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Feb/0091.html > > IMHO, WebDAV directory listings should have been GET-able resources. Sure. However, I yet have to see a practical proposal how a) the "properties" URI for a given resource would be detected and b) how the various PROPFIND functionalities would map to headers (or query parameters). Julian
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2002 13:13:22 UTC