- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:04:30 +0000
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
At 08:50 PM 3/27/02 +0000, Sean B. Palmer wrote: >OTOH, "Repr-Type" for Content-features is an interesting >prospect. Graham, you listed one of the advantages as >"administratively and politically easier to achieve", but I >actually can't work out what the registration process for new >headers is from the RFC. I presume that they're just defined in >RFCs, as for any normal HTTP header, so why would registering it >as a content-feature header be a path of less resistance? See RFC 2506. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2002 03:09:21 UTC