- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: 18 Mar 2002 16:41:49 -0500
- To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>, www-tag@w3.org
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 15:20, Paul Grosso wrote: > However, you are talking about empty URI references which isn't > the current topic. > > Instead, read the appropriate part about "5.2. Resolving Relative > References to Absolute Form". Specifically, the second step of > the algorithm: > > 2) If the path component is empty and the scheme, authority, and > query components are undefined, then it is a reference to the > current document and we are done. > > I don't find that ambiguous at all. I find the statement unambiguous but I'm not sure how you mean it. Are you suggesting (which I suspect) that: http://simonstl.com/# is in fact the same as: http://simonstl.com/ and if so, do you accept the use of http://simonstl.com/# as something different from http://simonstl.com/ ? Just looking for a clarification, to the extent that clarity has any meaning in this area. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
Received on Monday, 18 March 2002 15:37:03 UTC