www-tag@w3.org from March 2002 by date

Monday, 1 April 2002

• Re: What does a document mean? Tim Bray

Sunday, 31 March 2002

• HTTP issues/forums [ was: Re: ETags Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function ] Mark Nottingham
• Ambiguity as a solution rather than a problem (WAS: The range of the HTTP dereference function) Miles Sabin
• RE: ETags Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Larry Masinter
• ETags Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Jeff Bone
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: The range of the HTTP dereference function Miles Sabin
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Larry Masinter
• RE: REST and the Web Joshua Allen

Saturday, 30 March 2002

• Replacing PROPFIND with GET Mark Baker
• Re: What does a document mean? Mark Nottingham
• Re: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web) Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web) Julian Reschke
• Re: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web) Paul Prescod
• Re: REST and the Web Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web) Julian Reschke
• Re: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web) Paul Prescod
• Re: REST and the Web Paul Prescod
• Re: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web) Paul Prescod
• Re: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web) Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Using ontologies to compare resources was: Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: REST and the Web Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Friday, 29 March 2002

• Re: What does a document mean? Elliotte Rusty Harold
• [httpRange-14] What is the range of the HTTP dereference function? Ian B. Jacobs

Thursday, 28 March 2002

• RE: Using ontologies to compare resources (WAS: The range of the HTTP dereference function) Miles Sabin
• RE: Using ontologies to compare resources (WAS: The range of the HTTP dereference function) Joshua Allen
• What does a document mean? Norman Walsh
• Re: Using ontologies to compare resources (WAS: The range of the HTTP dereference function) Jonathan Borden
• Cars and People Brown Mark R
• Media feature considerations in HTTP Mark Baker
• RE: Using ontologies to compare resources (WAS: The range of the HTTP dereference function) Miles Sabin

Wednesday, 27 March 2002

• Re: [uriMediaType-9] New Internet Draft: Resrep Type Graham Klyne

Thursday, 28 March 2002

• Using ontologies to compare resources was: Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Jonathan Borden
• RE: The range of the HTTP dereference function Miles Sabin

Wednesday, 27 March 2002

• REST and the Web Paul Prescod
• RE: The range of the HTTP dereference function Joshua Allen
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Jonathan Borden
• RE: section 1, intro, for review David Orchard
• RE: The range of the HTTP dereference function Joshua Allen
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Jeff Bone
• Re: [uriMediaType-9] New Internet Draft: Resrep Type Sean B. Palmer
• RE: The range of the HTTP dereference function Mike Dierken
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Jonathan Borden
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Mark Baker
• What a URI reference identifies Jonathan Borden
• Re: [uriMediaType-9] New Internet Draft: Resrep Type Graham Klyne
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• Re: [uriMediaType-9] New Internet Draft: Resrep Type Mark Baker
• Re: Defining the Web Mark Baker
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Dan Connolly
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Paul Prescod
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [uriMediaType-9] New Internet Draft: Resrep Type Graham Klyne
• [uriMediaType-9] New Internet Draft: Resrep Type Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Section 2: What does a URI identify? (and range of HTTP deref) Sean B. Palmer
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Miles Sabin
• RE: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Bill de hÓra
• Re: Defining the Web Mark Nottingham
• Re: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Jeff Bone
• Re: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Jeff Bone
• RE: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Miles Sabin
• RE: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Miles Sabin
• Re: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Jeff Bone
• RE: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Miles Sabin
• Re: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Jeff Bone
• RE: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Miles Sabin
• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Mike Dierken
• RE: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Mike Dierken
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• RE: Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Miles Sabin

Tuesday, 26 March 2002

• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Jacek Kopecky
• Genericity, strong typing, SOAP-RPC, GRASP, and defining the Web Jeff Bone
• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Joshua Allen
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Christopher Ferris
• Re: Defining the Web Jeff Bone
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Joshua Allen
• Re: Defining the Web noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Section 2: What does a URI identify? (and range of HTTP deref) Bill de hÓra
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Joshua Allen
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Christopher Ferris
• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Mark Baker
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Christopher Ferris
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: section 1, intro, for review Don Box
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• RE: SOAP breaks HTTP? Joshua Allen
• Section 2: What does a URI identify? (and range of HTTP deref) Tim Bray
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Mark Baker
• Re: Defining the Web Mark Nottingham
• Re: SOAP breaks HTTP? Paul Prescod
• Re: Defining the Web Tim Bray
• Re: cost of new/private URI schemes well known? [was: section 1, intro, for review] Tim Bray

Monday, 25 March 2002

• SOAP breaks HTTP? Tim Bray

Tuesday, 26 March 2002

• section 1, intro: summary of substantive feedback so far Dan Connolly

Monday, 25 March 2002

• Re: boundaries for the Web Dan Connolly
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Dan Connolly
• app-specific contracts: win? lose? [was: section 1, intro, for review] Dan Connolly
• Summary of 25 March 2002 TAG teleconference Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: "canonical" URIs noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: "canonical" URIs Tim Bray
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Rick Jelliffe
• Proposed Issue: RFC3205 Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 24 March 2002

• Re: boundaries for the Web Gavin Thomas Nicol

Friday, 22 March 2002

• subject lines: is all this really about section 1, intro? Dan Connolly
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Paul Prescod
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Roy T. Fielding
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Don Box
• Re: boundaries for the Web Mark Nottingham
• Re: boundaries for the Web Paul Prescod
• Re: boundaries for the Web Simon St.Laurent
• RE: boundaries for the Web Brown Mark R
• RE: boundaries for the Web Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Defining the Web Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• RE: boundaries for the Web Bill de hÓra
• Re: Defining the Web Simon St.Laurent
• RE: boundaries for the Web Simon St.Laurent
• Re: boundaries for the Web Simon St.Laurent
• RE: boundaries for the Web David Orchard
• Re: boundaries for the Web Rob Lanphier
• Defining the Web Mark Baker
• Re: boundaries for the Web Mark Nottingham
• Re: boundaries for the Web Simon St.Laurent

Thursday, 21 March 2002

• Re: boundaries for the Web Dan Connolly
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: boundaries for the Web Brown Mark R
• boundaries for the Web Simon St.Laurent
• Re: "canonical" URIs Norman Walsh
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Roy T. Fielding
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Simon St.Laurent
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Roy T. Fielding
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 20 March 2002

• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Point of order re traffic Tim Bray
• Re: Point of order re traffic Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Point of order re traffic Dan Connolly
• Point of order re traffic Tim Bray
• Re: RFC 3205 Simon St.Laurent
• RE: The range of the HTTP dereference function Mike Dierken
• Re: RFC 3205 Rob Lanphier
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Jonathan Borden
• Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) Paul Prescod
• Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) Tim Berners-Lee
• RFC 3205 Mark Baker
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Paul Prescod
• Re: Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Brian McBride
• Re: Re[2]: cost of new/private URI schemes well known? [was: section 1, intro, for review] Steven Livingstone
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Rob Lanphier
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Mark Nottingham
• RE: section 1, intro, for review David Orchard
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Rob Lanphier
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Paul Prescod
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Jonathan Borden
• Re: Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Roy T. Fielding
• RE: "canonical" URIs David Orchard
• Re: Web boundaries (was RE: section 1, intro, for review) Simon St.Laurent
• Re: "canonical" URIs noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Roy T. Fielding
• Re: "canonical" URIs Mark Baker
• Re: Web boundaries (was RE: section 1, intro, for review) Mark Baker
• Re[2]: cost of new/private URI schemes well known? [was: section 1, intro, for review] Chris Lilley
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Roy T. Fielding
• Re: "canonical" URIs Mark Nottingham
• Re: Space Varying URIs in Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Mark Nottingham
• RE: Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Williams, Stuart

Tuesday, 19 March 2002

• RE: cost of new/private URI schemes well known? [was: section 1, intro, for review] Mike Dierken
• Re: cost of new/private URI schemes well known? [was: section 1, intro, for review] Steven Livingstone
• mailboxes and telephones in the Web Dan Connolly
• RE: "canonical" URIs Biron,Paul V
• cost of new/private URI schemes well known? [was: section 1, intro, for review] Dan Connolly
• RE: Web boundaries (was RE: section 1, intro, for review) David Orchard
• RE: "canonical" URIs David Orchard
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Paul Prescod
• Re: Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Jonathan Borden
• Re: section 1, intro, for review noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Space Varying URIs in Summary: Section 2: What does a URI id entify? Williams, Stuart
• Re: Re[2]: section 1, intro, for review noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Williams, Stuart
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Paul Prescod
• Re: Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Jonathan Borden
• Space Varying URIs in Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Jonathan Borden
• Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Brian McBride
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Aaron Swartz
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Aaron Swartz
• Re: Summary of 18 March TAG teleconference - identity and resources Graham Klyne
• Re: Does XLink have a future at W3C? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function Mark Baker
• Does XLink have a future at W3C? Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Chris Lilley
• The range of the HTTP dereference function Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Paul Prescod
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Brian McBride
• Re: section 1, intro, for review s.livingstone@btinternet.com
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Roy T. Fielding
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Mark Baker
• Re[2]: section 1, intro, for review Chris Lilley
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Mark Baker
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Paul Prescod
• Web boundaries (was RE: section 1, intro, for review) Simon St.Laurent
• Re: section 1, intro, for review noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re[2]: section 1, intro, for review Chris Lilley
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Paul Prescod
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Paul Prescod
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Jonathan Borden
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Jonathan Borden
• RE: section 1, intro, for review David Orchard

Monday, 18 March 2002

• RE: section 1, intro, for review noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: section 1, intro, for review noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Jonathan Borden

Tuesday, 19 March 2002

• RE: section 1, intro, for review Simon St.Laurent

Monday, 18 March 2002

• RE: section 1, intro, for review David Orchard
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Mark Baker
• Re[2]: section 1, intro, for review Chris Lilley
• Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Chris Lilley
• Re: section 1, intro, for review noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Norman Walsh
• Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Chris Lilley
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Paul Grosso
• Summary of 18 March TAG teleconference Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Paul Grosso
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Jonathan Borden
• RE: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Brown Mark R
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Tim Bray
• XML Processing Model workshop strawpolls Paul Cotton
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Mark Baker
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Christopher Ferris
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Dan Connolly
• Re[2]: section 1, intro, for review Chris Lilley
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Mark Baker
• Re: section 1, intro, for review Christopher Ferris
• RE: section 1, intro, for review Paul Cotton

Sunday, 17 March 2002

• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Mark Baker
• section 1, intro, for review Dan Connolly
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Mark Baker

Saturday, 16 March 2002

• RE: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Williams, Stuart
• Re: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Brian McBride

Friday, 15 March 2002

• Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Norman Walsh

Thursday, 14 March 2002

• Re: Processing Model and ISO DSDL Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf Christopher Ferris
• Processing Model and ISO DSDL Rick Jelliffe

Wednesday, 13 March 2002

• RE: Using W3C standard formats on W3C Lists s.livingstone@btinternet.com
• RE: Using W3C standard formats on W3C Lists Paul Cotton
• Re: Using W3C standard formats on W3C Lists tvraman@almaden.ibm.com
• Re: Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Using W3C standard formats on W3C Lists Tim Berners-Lee

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

• Re: Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf Roy T. Fielding
• Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf Ian B. Jacobs
• Summary of TAG activity in Jan and Feb 2002 Ian B. Jacobs

Monday, 11 March 2002

• Using W3C standard formats on W3C Lists tvraman@almaden.ibm.com
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF Patrick Stickler

Friday, 8 March 2002

• notes from 4 Mar TAG telcon [was: IRC log?] Dan Connolly
• Re[2]: IRC log? Chris Lilley
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF Jonathan Borden
• Re: IRC log? Chris Lilley
• IRC log? Simon St.Laurent
• Crash course in mid-east conflict JustTheTruth
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 7 March 2002

• Re: Namespace dispatching Paul Prescod

Monday, 4 March 2002

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Architecture doc Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Tim Berners-Lee

Sunday, 3 March 2002

• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 David Orchard

Monday, 4 March 2002

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Norman Walsh
• Re: Namespace dispatching Norman Walsh
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Norman Walsh
• Re: Namespace dispatching Norman Walsh
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Norman Walsh

Friday, 1 March 2002

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Bray
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Mark Nottingham
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Mark Baker
• Architecture doc Tim Bray
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF Tim Bray
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Paul Prescod
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Williams, Stuart
• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? Elliotte Rusty Harold

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 23:57:51 UTC