www-tag@w3.org from July 2002 by date

Thursday, 1 August 2002

• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Mark Baker

Wednesday, 31 July 2002

• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Dan Connolly
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Aaron Swartz
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: httpRange proposed text Bill de hÓra

Tuesday, 30 July 2002

• RE: fragment identifiers Joshua Allen
• RE: httpRange proposed text Joshua Allen
• Re: httpRange proposed text Tim Bray
• Re: fragment identifiers Mark Baker
• Re: Taxis via HTTP? [Was: Re: [Minutes] 29 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15)] Michael Mealling
• Taxis via HTTP? [Was: Re: [Minutes] 29 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15)] Chris Croome
• URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Jonathan Borden
• Re: [Minutes] 29 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15) Michael Mealling
• [httpRange-14] range of mid:, tel:, uuid: etc. Dan Connolly
• [Minutes] 29 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15) Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: httpRange proposed text Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Thoughts on "what does an HTTP URI identify?" Graham Klyne
• RE: Fixed Section 1.1 language Julian Reschke
• RE: httpRange proposed text Joshua Allen
• Re: httpRange proposed text Tim Bray
• [httpRange-14] Re: fragment identifiers Sean B. Palmer
• Maintaining uniformity with HTTP URIs Mark Baker

Monday, 29 July 2002

• Re: httpRange proposed text Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: httpRange proposed text Joshua Allen
• Re: httpRange proposed text Tim Bray
• Just updated s1.1 arch doc draft again Tim Bray
• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language Tim Bray
• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language Tim Bray
• httpRange proposed text Joshua Allen
• customMediaType-2 : charset in RFC 3023 Chris Lilley
• Re: fragment identifiers Tim Bray
• RE: fragment identifiers Dan Connolly
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Jonathan Borden
• [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Aaron Swartz
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Jonathan Borden
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Tim Berners-Lee

Friday, 26 July 2002

• RE: fragment identifiers nick@webthing.com
• Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries Jonathan Borden
• Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries Jonathan Borden
• Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries Mark Baker
• Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries Christopher B Ferris
• RE: fragment identifiers Joshua Allen
• RE: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries Joshua Allen
• Re: [Finding] Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Co ntent Joseph Reagle
• RE: [Finding] Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Co ntent Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: fragment identifiers nick@webthing.com
• Fragment identifiers and intermediaries Mark Baker
• RE: fragment identifiers Joshua Allen
• Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content james anderson
• RE: fragment identifiers Joshua Allen
• Re: fragment identifiers Mark Baker
• Re: fragment identifiers Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 25 July 2002

• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? Miles Sabin
• Re: fragment identifiers Tim Bray
• Re: On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs Dan Connolly
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? Bill de hÓra
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? Bill de hÓra
• RE: fragment identifiers Joshua Allen
• Re: fragment identifiers Dan Connolly
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers Roy T. Fielding
• Re: fragment identifiers Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Finding] Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content Joseph Reagle
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? Mike Dierken
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? Joshua Allen
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? Joshua Allen
• [Finding] Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and Semantics Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? Tim Bray
• [Finding] Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? Lucas Gonze
• [Agenda] 29 July 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc, httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15) Ian B. Jacobs

Wednesday, 24 July 2002

• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? Tim Bray
• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? Lucas Gonze
• [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? Ian B. Jacobs
• [contentTypeOverride-24] Can a specification include rules for overriding HTTP content type parameters? Ian B. Jacobs
• URIEquivalence-15 (was: Re: [Minutes] 22 July TAG teleconf) Martin Duerst
• Re: fragment identifiers Sean B. Palmer
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers Jonathan Borden
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers Michael Mealling
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers Jonathan Borden
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers Michael Mealling
• resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers Jonathan Borden
• Re: fragment identifiers Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: fragment identifiers Jonathan Borden
• Re: fragment identifiers Jonathan Borden
• Re: fragment identifiers Roy T. Fielding
• RE: fragment identifiers Joshua Allen
• RE: fragment identifiers Joshua Allen
• RE: fragment identifiers Joshua Allen
• Re: fragment identifiers Jonathan Borden
• Re: fragment identifiers Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 23 July 2002

• Re: fragment identifiers Roy T. Fielding
• [Minutes] 22 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, httpRange-14, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: fragment identifiers Al Gilman
• Re: fragment identifiers Al Gilman
• Re: fragment identifiers Tim Bray
• Re: fragment identifiers Graham Klyne
• fragment identifiers Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 22 July 2002

• RE: Context Independent URI Williams, Stuart
• Re: Context Independent URI Dan Connolly
• Section 1.1 Characteristics of URIs: Minor editorial Williams, Stuart
• RE: Context Independent URI Williams, Stuart
• RE: Context Independent URI Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Context Independent URI Tim Bray
• RE: Context Independent URI Mike Dierken
• Re: Context Independent URI Aaron Swartz
• Re: Context Independent URI Tim Bray
• Re: Context Independent URI Michael Mealling
• RE: Context Independent URI Williams, Stuart
• Re: Context Independent URI Miles Sabin
• RE: Context Independent URI Williams, Stuart
• RE: Context Independent URI Williams, Stuart
• RE: Context Independent URI Williams, Stuart

Sunday, 21 July 2002

• Re: Context Independent URI Miles Sabin
• Re: Context Independent URI Aaron Swartz
• Context Independent URI Williams, Stuart
• Re: On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs Bjoern Hoehrmann

Saturday, 20 July 2002

• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Nick Kew

Friday, 19 July 2002

• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Mike Dierken
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Sean B. Palmer
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Norman Walsh
• Re: resource and representation Nick Kew
• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language Christopher B Ferris

Thursday, 18 July 2002

• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Tim Bray
• range of http: modeling HTTP in RDF Jonathan Borden
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Paul Prescod
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Bill de hÓra
• [Agenda] 22 July TAG teleconference (arch doc, httpRange-14,...) Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Matthew Wilson
• Re: On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs Norman Walsh
• Re: On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs Dan Connolly
• On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs Norman Walsh
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Jonathan Borden
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Bill de hÓra
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Paul Prescod
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Paul Prescod
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Bill de hÓra
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Bill de hÓra
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Bill de hÓra
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Joshua Allen
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Joshua Allen
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Joshua Allen
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Graham Klyne
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Graham Klyne
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Paul Prescod
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Paul Prescod

Wednesday, 17 July 2002

• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Roy T. Fielding
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Joshua Allen
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Roy T. Fielding
• RE: xlink:href Bill de hÓra
• Re: xlink:href Tim Bray
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Mike Dierken
• Re: Internet Media Type registration Re: [Minutes] 8 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, media types, formatting props, whenToUseGet-7, augmentedInfoset-22) Graham Klyne
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Miles Sabin
• Re: Updated finding: Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and Semantics Masayasu Ishikawa
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Joshua Allen

Tuesday, 16 July 2002

• httpRange-14 , what's the problem Tim Bray
• Fixed Section 1.1 language Tim Bray
• Re: xlink:href Steven Pemberton
• [Minutes] 15 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, qnames as ids, formatting props, httpRange-14) Ian B. Jacobs

Monday, 15 July 2002

• RE: Architecture Document: Terminology: Dereferencable, Retrivabl e, R esolvable. Williams, Stuart
• Re: Architecture Document: Terminology: Dereferencable, Retrivable, R esolvable. Paul Prescod
• Republished finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content Norman Walsh
• Internet Media Type registration Re: [Minutes] 8 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, media types, formatting props, whenToUseGet-7, augmentedInfoset-22) Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Architecture Document: Terminology: Dereferencable, Retrivable, R esolvable. Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Proposed TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Ident ifiers in Content Norman Walsh
• Updated finding: Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and Semantics Norman Walsh
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Norman Walsh

Tuesday, 9 July 2002

• Re: Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linking Graham Klyne

Saturday, 13 July 2002

• Re: resource and representation Roy T. Fielding
• Re: using http URIs to name IETF protocol elements [was: TB16] Keith Moore

Friday, 12 July 2002

• Re: xlink:href Christopher B Ferris
• Re: xlink:href Tim Bray
• Re: resource and representation (and fragment identifiers) Kenneth J. Hughes
• Re: using http URIs to name IETF protocol elements [was: TB16] Mark Baker
• Re: using http URIs to name IETF protocol elements [was: TB16] Aaron Swartz
• using http URIs to name IETF protocol elements [was: TB16] Dan Connolly
• Re: xlink:href Steven Pemberton
• Architecture Document: Terminology: Dereferencable, Retrivable, R esolvable. Williams, Stuart
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Tim Bray
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Martin Duerst

Wednesday, 10 July 2002

• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Martin Duerst

Thursday, 11 July 2002

• [Agenda] 15 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, qnames, formatting props, httpRange-14) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Range of Web architecture? (was Re: Early draft of Architecture Document for your review Mark Baker
• Re: I'd like to un-raise augmentedInfoset-22 Simon St.Laurent

Wednesday, 10 July 2002

• RE: I'd like to un-raise augmentedInfoset-22 Paul Cotton
• I'd like to un-raise augmentedInfoset-22 Tim Bray
• Re: XLINK, HLINK or neither? Possible new TAG issue Steven Pemberton
• Re: Re: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" Anthony B. Coates

Tuesday, 9 July 2002

• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Elliotte Rusty Harold

Wednesday, 10 July 2002

• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Martin Duerst
• [Minutes] 8 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, media types, formatting props, whenToUseGet-7, augmentedInfoset-22) Ian B. Jacobs

Tuesday, 9 July 2002

• RE: Infoset consistency between versions Paul Cotton
• RE: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" Joshua Allen
• RE: Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linking Joshua Allen
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Tim Bray
• Re: Infoset consistency between versions Tim Bray
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Roy T. Fielding
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Tim Bray
• Re: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" Tim Bray
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Tim Bray
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Martin Duerst
• RE: resource and representation Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content Michael Kay
• Re: Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RE: Infoset consistency between versions Paul Cotton
• Re: Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Anthony B. Coates
• Re: TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content Chris Lilley
• Re: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" Mark Baker
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Chris Lilley
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• Infoset consistency between versions Rick Jelliffe
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs Martin Duerst
• TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content Michael Kay
• "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" Joshua Allen
• "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" Joshua Allen

Monday, 8 July 2002

• Re: resource and representation Roy T. Fielding
• Summary of TAG activity from 9 June to 2 July 2002 Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Some comments on latest draft Tim Bray
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Norman Walsh
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Norman Walsh
• RE: resource and representation Bullard, Claude L (Len)

Sunday, 7 July 2002

• Re: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties Håkon Wium Lie

Friday, 5 July 2002

• RE: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) Christopher B Ferris
• Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linking Tim Bray
• RE: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) Williams, Stuart
• Re: resource and representation Patrick Stickler
• Re: resource and representation Patrick Stickler
• Re: resource and representation Patrick Stickler
• RE: resource and representation Bill de hÓra
• Re: resource and representation Paul Prescod
• Re: resource and representation Miles Sabin
• Re: resource and representation Paul Prescod
• Re: resource and representation Patrick Stickler
• Re: resource and representation Patrick Stickler
• Re: resource and representation Paul Prescod
• RE: resource and representation Joshua Allen

Thursday, 4 July 2002

• Re: Representations of Resources and Precision of Denotation (was Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft) Jonathan Borden
• Re: xlink:href Paul Prescod
• ConegFragment (was Re: Early draft of Architecture Document for your review Mark Baker
• Re: resource and representation Paul Prescod
• Re: [Agenda] 8 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• Re: [Agenda] 8 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• [Agenda] 8 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: xlink:href Chris Lilley
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: resource and representation Patrick Stickler
• Re: Namespace document and representations was Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'?: Re: TB16 Re:Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler
• Representations of Resources and Precision of Denotation (was Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft) Patrick Stickler
• Re: resource and representation Paul Prescod
• resource and representation Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 3 July 2002

• RE: Namespace document and representations was Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'? Joshua Allen
• Two requests regarding TB16- was: naming and neccessity Bill de hÓra
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bill de hÓra
• Namespace document and representations was Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'? Jonathan Borden
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Mark Baker
• Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'?: Re: TB16 Re:Comments on arch doc draft Jonathan Borden
• Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'?: Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Bray
• Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'?: Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Jonathan Borden
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft David Orchard
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Paul Prescod
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Jonathan Borden
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Joshua Allen
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Paul Prescod
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Joshua Allen
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Jonathan Borden
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Joshua Allen
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Paul Prescod
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Rick Jelliffe
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Paul Grosso
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Williams, Stuart
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme Rick Jelliffe
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Jonathan Borden
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 2 July 2002

• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Paul Prescod
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Bray
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Michael Mealling
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Paul Prescod
• [w3cMediaType-1] How to Register an Media Type with IANA Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Joshua Allen
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Paul Grosso
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft David Orchard
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Bray
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) Jonathan Borden
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Dare Obasanjo
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Williams, Stuart
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) Graham Klyne
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Bray
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Bray
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Paul Prescod
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Paul Prescod
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Jonathan Borden
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Michael Mealling
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) Jonathan Borden
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Bray
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Jonathan Borden
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Jonathan Borden
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) Paul Grosso
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Michael Mealling
• Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) Graham Klyne
• xlink:href Paul Prescod
• Re: A radical finding on Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content Rick Jelliffe
• Re: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Joshua Allen
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Dare Obasanjo
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Bray
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Bray
• httpRange-14; closer than we think to closing it? Mark Baker

Monday, 1 July 2002

• Early draft of Architecture Document for your review Ian B. Jacobs
• [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Michael Mealling
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Joshua Allen
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Paul Prescod
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Dare Obasanjo
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Dare Obasanjo
• TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft Tim Berners-Lee

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2002 21:04:17 UTC