Tuesday, 30 April 2002
- RE: What Are the Payoffs for SOAP? (WAS RE: Comments on draft-hol lenb eck-ietf-xml-guidelines-02.txt)
- Re: Summary of 29 Apr 2002 TAG teleconference
- What Are the Payoffs for SOAP? (WAS RE: Comments on draft-hollenb eck-ietf-xml-guidelines-02.txt)
- Re: Comments on draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-02.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-02.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-02.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-02.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-02.txt
- Fwd: 2nd Last Call for the Character Model for the WWW
Monday, 29 April 2002
- [qnameAsId-18] Is it ok to use Qnames as Identifiers?
- [charmodReview-17] Request to review Character Model for the Web 1.0
- Summary of 29 Apr 2002 TAG teleconference
- RE: Notes on draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-01.txt
- Fwd: XML Guidelines -02
- FW: XML Guidelines -02
- Re: URIEquivalence-15
- Re: URIEquivalence-15
- Re: URIEquivalence-15
- RE: URIEquivalence-15
- Re: URIEquivalence-15
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 Why call it WEB Serivces? (was: RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
- Re: Notes on draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-01.txt
Sunday, 28 April 2002
Saturday, 27 April 2002
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Why call it WEB Serivces? (was: RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- Re: SOAP and State (was: Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Why call it WEB Serivces? (was: RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
Friday, 26 April 2002
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Why call it WEB Serivces? (was: RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
- whenToUseGet-7 Why call it WEB Serivces? (was: RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
- Re: TAG clarification
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- TAG clarification
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- RE: SOAP and State (was: Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- Re: SOAP and State (was: Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- RE: SOAP and State (was: Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
Thursday, 25 April 2002
- SOAP and State (was: Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
- RE: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- Re: [Agenda] 29 April TAG teleconference: XML-in-IETF, whenToUseGet-7, URIEquivalence-15, rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- RE: [Agenda] 29 April TAG teleconference: XML-in-IETF, whenToUseGet-7, URIEquivalence-15, rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
- Re: URIEquivalence-15
- [Agenda] 29 April TAG teleconference: XML-in-IETF, whenToUseGet-7, URIEquivalence-15, rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
- Re: HTTPSubstrate-16
Wednesday, 24 April 2002
- Re: [WhenToUseGet-7] oops, thinko in URLencoding proposal
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- whenToUseGet-7 Making SOAP Restful
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: Another whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- [WhenToUseGet-7] oops, thinko in URLencoding proposal
- Re: Another whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: Another whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- RE: Another whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: Another whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Another whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: HTTPSubstrate-16
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- the Web, again (RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7))
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
Tuesday, 23 April 2002
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Summary of 2002-04-22 TAG meeting
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
Monday, 22 April 2002
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: Are QNames in Attribute Values Permitted as Identifiers?
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Notes on draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-01.txt
- RE: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGe t-7)
- HTTPSubstrate-16
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Possible HTTP GET bindings for SOAP
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
Sunday, 21 April 2002
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
Saturday, 20 April 2002
- Re: No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- No consensus on draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
Friday, 19 April 2002
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: What does a document mean?
- Re: What does a document mean?
- Are QNames in Attribute Values Permitted as Identifiers?
- RE: The range of the HTTP dereference function
- Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: The range of the HTTP dereference function
Thursday, 18 April 2002
- Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- [Agenda] 22 April TAG teleconf
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function
- Re: Section 2: What does a URI identify? (and range of HTTP deref)
- Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
Wednesday, 17 April 2002
- RE: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
Tuesday, 16 April 2002
- RE: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Information Space Definition and Auditability
- Summary of 15 April 2002 TAG meeting
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
Thursday, 1 January 1970
Tuesday, 16 April 2002
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
Monday, 15 April 2002
- FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- RE: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: [fwd] Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- [fwd] Re: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
Sunday, 14 April 2002
Saturday, 13 April 2002
Friday, 12 April 2002
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- RE: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- RE: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: URI resolution (was Re: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference)
- Re: Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
Thursday, 11 April 2002
- Re: Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
- RE: [HTTPSubstrate-16] What is W3C's position on RFC 3205?
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- Re: "resolution mechanism"
- "resolution mechanism"
- RE: [HTTPSubstrate-16] What is W3C's position on RFC 3205?
- Secure authorization protocol for WWW
- RE: Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
- Re: Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
- Re: Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
Wednesday, 10 April 2002
- Re: Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
- Re: Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
- Re: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: "Guidelines for the Use of XML in IETF Protocols"
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8]: format for machine readable content
Tuesday, 9 April 2002
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: URI resolution (was Re: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference)
- Re: URI resolution (was Re: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference)
- URI resolution (was Re: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference)
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference
- FW: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference
- Re: Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
- Re: XML - Database Question
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- XML - Database Question
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference
- Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8]: format for machine readable content
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
Monday, 8 April 2002
Tuesday, 9 April 2002
Monday, 8 April 2002
- Re: RFC 3205 background (HTTPSubstrate-16)
- RE: [HTTPSubstrate-16] What is W3C's position on RFC 3205?
- RE: "Guidelines for the Use of XML in IETF Protocols"
- Fw: "Guidelines for the Use of XML in IETF Protocols"
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
Sunday, 7 April 2002
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8]: format for machine readable content
- [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL
- RE: [HTTPSubstrate-16] What is W3C's position on RFC 3205?
- RE: Mailto misnamed not misdesigned (Was: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web))
- Re: Mailto misnamed not misdesigned (Was: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web))
Saturday, 6 April 2002
- RE: Draft agenda of meeting 8 April
- [namespaceDocument-8]: format for machine readable content
- RE: What does a document mean?
Friday, 5 April 2002
- namespaceDocument-8 - HTML + metadata
- Re: RFC 3205 background (HTTPSubstrate-16)
- Re: RFC 3205 background (HTTPSubstrate-16)
- Re: RFC 3205 background (HTTPSubstrate-16)
- RE: What does a document mean?
- Re: What does a document mean?
- Re: RFC 3205 background (HTTPSubstrate-16)
Thursday, 4 April 2002
- Re: Mailto misnamed not misdesigned (Was: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web))
- Re: Mailto misnamed not misdesigned (Was: Hyperlinks depend onGET (was: Re: REST and the Web))
- "Document" vs. "Resource" (was RE: namespaceDocument-8 and nsMedi aType-3)
- namespaceDocument-8 and nsMediaType-3
- namespaceDocument-8 - Comment on resolutions discussed in Apr conf. call
- Summary of TAG activity in March 2002
- RE: TAG seeks input re www-tag
Wednesday, 3 April 2002
- Re: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- RE: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- RE: [HTTPSubstrate-16] What is W3C's position on RFC 3205?
- Re: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- Re: [HTTPSubstrate-16] What is W3C's position on RFC 3205?
- Re: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- Re: Mailto misnamed not misdesigned (Was: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web))
Tuesday, 2 April 2002
Wednesday, 3 April 2002
Tuesday, 2 April 2002
- Re: Mailto misnamed not misdesigned (Was: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web))
- Re: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- Re: Mailto misnamed not misdesigned (Was: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web))
- Re: RFC 3205 background (HTTPSubstrate-16)
- Re: RFC 3205 background (HTTPSubstrate-16)
- Re: Draft agenda of meeting 8 April
- RFC 3205 background (HTTPSubstrate-16)
- Re: Draft agenda of meeting 8 April
- Re: Draft agenda of meeting 8 April
- RE: REST and the Web
- What is a namespace document (Re: Summary of 1 April 2002 TAG teleconference)
- RE: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- Re: Summary of 1 April 2002 TAG teleconference
- [Correction] s/3025/3205/ [Was: [HTTPSubstrate-16] What is W3C's position on RFC 3025?]
Monday, 1 April 2002
- RE: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- Re: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- RE: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- Re: ETags Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function
- RE: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- Re: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- [HTTPSubstrate-16] What is W3C's position on RFC 3025?
- Re: Draft agenda of meeting 8 April
- [URIEquivalence-15] When are two URI variants considered identical?
- RE: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- Draft agenda of meeting 8 April
- RE: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- Mailto misnamed not misdesigned (Was: Hyperlinks depend on GET (was: Re: REST and the Web))
- RE: TAG seeks input re www-tag
- TAG seeks input re www-tag
- RE: REST and the Web
- Information Set
- Summary of 1 April 2002 TAG teleconference
- Re: REST and the Web
- Proposed TAG issue on the boundaries of the Web
- RE: REST and the Web
- RE: Fwd: What does a document mean?
- Re: Media feature considerations in HTTP
- Re: What does a document mean?
- Re: Draft rewrite of Arch TOC Intro clause
- Draft rewrite of Arch TOC Intro clause