W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2020

Weekly github digest (csswg-drafts)

From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:00:51 +0000
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1jEFaF-0002An-G5@uranus.w3.org>



Events with label "SVG", "css-fill-and-stroke-3", "css-shapes-1", "css-shapes-2", "css-transforms-1", "css-transforms-2", "fx-filter-effects-1", "web-animations-1", "web-animations-2"

Issues
------
* w3c/csswg-drafts (+1/-1/💬17)
  1 issues created:
  - [scroll-animations] Remove requirement for animation duration on finite timelines (by flackr)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4862 [scroll-animations] [web-animations-1] 

  7 issues received 17 new comments:
  - #4874 [css-values] Quirky lengths and math expressions (1 by faceless2)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4874 [SVG] [css-values-3] 
  - #4862 [scroll-animations] Support progress-based animations on finite timelines (4 by birtles, flackr)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4862 [scroll-animations] [web-animations-1] 
  - #4745 [web-animations-1] Clarification about `target` and `pseudoElement` relationship (4 by birtles, lpd-au)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4745 [web-animations-1] [web-animations-css-integration] 
  - #4662 [css-transforms-1] 'view-box' definition doesn't make sense (1 by AmeliaBR)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4662 [Closed Rejected as Wontfix by CSSWG Resolution] [SVG] [css-box-3] [css-transforms-1] 
  - #4556 [web-animations-1] Should ready / finished rejections be marked as handled? (3 by birtles, flackr, graouts)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4556 [web-animations-1] 
  - #3305 [css-transforms-2] Is it necessary to serialize all 3 components of translate given the 3rd component is 0px (1 by css-meeting-bot)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3305 [css-transforms-2] 
  - #2066 [web-animations-1] Make animations become idle when they have an inactive timeline (3 by birtles)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2066 [scroll-animations] [web-animations-1] 

  1 issues closed:
  - [web-animations-1] Should ready / finished rejections be marked as handled? https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4556 [web-animations-1] 



Pull requests
-------------
* w3c/csswg-drafts (+1/-1/💬3)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - [web-animations-1] Mark ready and finished promise rejections as handled (by birtles)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4873 [web-animations-1] 

  1 pull requests received 3 new comments:
  - #4873 [web-animations-1] Mark ready and finished promise rejections as handled (3 by birtles, flackr, graouts)
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4873 [web-animations-1] 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - [web-animations-1] Mark ready and finished promise rejections as handled
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4873 [web-animations-1] 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2020 17:00:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 17 March 2020 17:00:54 UTC