- From: Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:14:27 -0500
- To: Domenico Strazzullo <strazzullo.domenico@gmail.com>
- Cc: ddailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFm2N+uBMKRZiP730jCRkJACAyyZTqcsBaKXy3c0N+7TUvhjHw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi David, You and I have both been working on tessellations for quite awhile. I like what you've shown in your recent work http://cs.sru.edu/~ddailey/tiling/tilingNew.html Would it be acceptable to add a few of the tiles to my SVG tessellation site:http://svg-tile.com They would be shown via selection of the *"Tile Tessellations"* button. Let me know, Thanks, Francis On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 9:58 AM Domenico Strazzullo < strazzullo.domenico@gmail.com> wrote: > Good old David. I must admit that if players in a rectangular field could > only move within rectangular strategy zones it would be kind of rectangular > to watch. But the defenders of the Rectangular Web could argue that a page > layout is not a playing field for sports. > It may be temporary, but the links to the cs.sru.edu link don’t work, and > I‘d like to check them out. I’ll try later. > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 2:00 PM David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net> > wrote: > >> Howdy all! >> >> I saw a bunch of familiar names on the mailing list of late and thought I >> should say hi. >> >> Ya'll might recall, from some years back, that I had done a thing [1,2] >> about how CSS (built for the world of text, as confined by the world of >> printing), being used as a layout model for SVG (built for graphics) was >> unfortunate. >> >> The handful (maybe I'm exaggerating) of people who actually listened, >> explained patiently to me that getting people to think beyond the hallowed >> confines of rectangles was far too radical a notion to consider by an >> august body interested in standards. >> >> Nonetheless, my belief that web science is bigger than web standards and >> that the field of combinatorics (employing theorems and the like) is more >> enduring than SVG1.2 or SVG2.n, has kept alive my interest in understanding >> and even cataloging rectangular thinking, as a sort of curious footnote to >> the current history of telecommunications. I just found out that Ron Graham >> [3], an old former co-traveler of mine from Alaskan days, was involved in >> this article [4] which talks about all the ways one can partition >> rectangles into rectangles. It represents, as such, a sort of encapsulated >> view of the structure of the domain allowed for page layout under the >> current regime. Many of those interested in the limitations of >> expressiveness currently allowed will find it of academic value. >> >> If you want to look at cooler ways of tiling (I've been working hard) >> take a peek at [5]. >> >> Cheers, >> David >> >> >> [1] http://cs.sru.edu/~ddailey/Parisien.html >> [2] http://cs.sru.edu/~ddailey/TGW2014/RectilinearMold2.html >> [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Graham >> [4] http://www.math.ucsd.edu/~ronspubs/82_04_tiling.pdf >> [5] http://cs.sru.edu/~ddailey/tiling/tilingNew.html >> >> >> >> >>
Received on Monday, 19 November 2018 21:15:01 UTC