- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:31:55 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Tab and I just wrapped up the last remaining edits from the Sydney F2F last year https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0358.html where we were asked to merge the spec with heycam's Strokes module. (Most of the edits went in last August, but we dropped the ball on wrapping them up and asking for publication, sorry.) The draft is here: https://drafts.fxtf.org/paint/ We think it is ready for FPWD. Note that there are a lot of issues: https://drafts.fxtf.org/paint/#issues-index This is okay. The point of FPWD is to say "we've got a a good rough draft of the module and are ready to ask for broader input", not "this is ready for implementation". (But we should probably discuss them all at some point, too.) If this is a topic that interests you, please have a look at the draft and let us know if * there is anything we forgot to add to the spec * there is a particular issue you absolutely want to resolve before FPWD * there are other issues that aren't noted in the spec or in github * you're OK with FPWD (We would also love it if anyone wants to send us a list of "Here are my preferred answers to all the open questions in the spec" as there are rather a lot.) Also, I'm proposing to mark this as Level 3 (post-SVG2) and Tab wants to mark it as Level 1 (first level after modularization), so we'll have to get a resolution on that, too. >:] ~fantasai and TJ
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 00:37:39 UTC