Re: Bug in grammar for paths

On 29.4.2017 18:57, Paul LeBeau wrote:
> Paths of the form that I presented do exist and are actually common.  I
> wasn't around when the grammar was originally written, so I don't know the
> reason why it was written the way it was.

Seems that grammar is only illustrational because there are other issues
with it -- for example grammar accepts only integers not decimal numbers.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
     Professional XML and Web consulting and training services
DocBook/DITA customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------