- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:39:02 -0600
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFDDJ7z8r404odnGiP15o4Y17xgiWowT7hFnJOajgwBLBXh-=w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Olaf, Stroke position was unfortunately deferred to a future SVG module, because we couldn't decide how stroke position in complex shapes should be implemented. The easy to implement options are not the most aesthetically pleasing options. The draft spec text, and descriptions of the outstanding issues, are available in the (rough draft of the) SVG Strokes module: https://svgwg.org/specs/strokes/ By the way, thanks for all of these comments on SVG 2, most of which deserve more than a quick 2-paragraph reply! ~Amelia Bellamy-Royds On 18 September 2016 at 04:35, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de> wrote: > Hello, > > there was a resolution (2011-10-28T18:13:25Z) > https://www.w3.org/2011/10/28-svg-irc#T18-13-25 > to be able to set the stroke position in SVG 2. > > In the CR I find only an annotation 4 in chapter 13 > about it. > The definition seems to be missing yet. > Can someone point me to the definition of it? > If not, why is it missing in the CR? > Would be useful always to refer from such an > annotation to the defintion of the feature. > Some of these annotations are arround in the > CR, but sometimes the definitions seem to be > in a completely different area > (see for example annotation 3). > In such cases the annotation should point to > the specification of the feature to avoid confusion > and needless searches and enquiries. > > Olaf > >
Received on Sunday, 18 September 2016 15:39:31 UTC