- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:07:00 -0400
- To: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, Nikos Andronikos <nikos.andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au>
Hi, Amelia– You know this already, from the SVG WG telcons, but I thought I'd expand on it here. This charter is a short-term (1 year rather than 2 year) "extension" to let us focus on finishing SVG 2. At some future point, we might consider closing the SVG WG and replacing it with a Graphics WG. That future point might be 6 months, a year, several years, or never. Personally, I like the idea of a Graphics WG that would help unify or normalize features between SVG and Canvas, including perhaps a single shared Web Graphics API, but that's not the intended scope of this particular charter. Regards– Doug On 9/13/16 12:45 PM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds wrote: > *SVG Working Group versus Graphics Working Group ? > * > > Re Doug's draft charter for the SVG WG 2016/2017. [1] > > One area to discuss on the charter is whether it makes sense to expand > the group's responsibility beyond SVG markup. > > When the HTML WG re-organized into the Web Platform WG, the Canvas 2D > API was left without an W3C host. I don't think work is terribly active > at WHATWG, either (although their spec is still much more up-to-date). > Last July, the SVG WG was asked if they'd take over responsibility. The > request was turned down at that time, partly because we didn't want to > distract from SVG 2, but partly also because there wasn't room in the > SVG charter for non-markup-based graphics specifications. [2] > > I would love to see better coordination between SVG and canvas. Authors > and user agents both benefit if rendering details are consistent between > the two syntaxes. The accessibility work would also benefit from > greater coordination. But it depends on whether there will actually be > people & organizations able to devote resources to the work. > > Of course, since this charter extension is only for 1 year, any decision > now is not final. But I thought I would bring it up so that people who > will be at TPAC can discuss with colleagues there. > > [1]: https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/svg-2016.html > <https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/svg-2016.html> > [2]: https://www.w3.org/2015/07/16-svg-minutes.html#item01 > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2016 22:07:05 UTC