- From: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:05:57 -0800
- To: Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJgFLLsdo51UDQR=LLJZXsU0v+397-DwvKYhgyBB9+f9MqEADg@mail.gmail.com>
Francis, We maintain a list of all major SVG changes at https://www.chromestatus.com/features#svg All major SVG changes are also posted to blink-dev if you'd like to follow along: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!forum/blink-dev On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Philip, > > It seems to me that the SVG2 updates via Chrome will take a few years to > complete. Chrome and developers will need a specific location to announce > and communicate. The best place for this to occur would be at > http://www.chromium.org/developers/discussion-groups > Merely include the group : Chromium-SVG. > Even following the SVG2 process, this could endure for any future SVG > changes. Believe me, the word will get out that any/all discussions for > Chrome's SVG will happen here. This should make the SVG transitions a > seamless and positive process for Chrome, allowing developers to appreciate > and understand Chrome's strategies relative to SVG. > > Regards, > Francis > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The issue with the path generated via D3 seems to be on my side of the >> fence, so no followup needed. >> >> As to the Chrome SVG developer notifications for upcoming SVG2 >> upgrades...Let me think on it a bit, and will get back to you. >> >> ( I can't understand how I missed the console warning...I practically >> live inside the console.log) >> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Francis, >>> >>> Please go ahead and create an issue on the github project for svgpathseg >>> about the interaction with d3. If you can include a specific example that >>> would be great. >>> >>> For notifying developers about SVG changes in Chrome... can you suggest >>> specifics for how could do better? For this change, we had many large >>> mailing list threads, a spec change and discussion on www-svg, developer >>> outreach to every site we could find (including directly committing patches >>> to fix svg-edit), and a warning message in the console for every user using >>> SVGPathSeg. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Philip, >>>> RE: your pathseg.js >>>> >>>> I use D3 quite a lot. Your polyfill may be stepping on some of its >>>> calculations relating to PATHSEG_CURVETO_CUBIC_SMOOTH_ABS, >>>> per d3.svg.line().interpolate("basis"): This builds the path's "d" >>>> attribute for the cubic "C" value. >>>> >>>> The particular app requires about 12-14 decimal places for each point. >>>> Is is possible your number handling may impact that? >>>> >>>> Where would be the best forum for us to discuss this further? I plan to >>>> create a few more tests and provide documentation to support my findings. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Francis >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> BTW, I've tested your polyfill packet, and so far, looks good, >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Philip, >>>>>> I totally support upgrading SVG API's to SVG2. However, it can be >>>>>> handled as a very positive process by Chrome, rather than by shocking >>>>>> developers via a piecemeal approach as has happened with pathSeg. I'm >>>>>> suggesting a more formal presentation by Chrome addressing SVG's upgrades >>>>>> as a whole. You will find SVG developers will enthusiastically jump on >>>>>> board and help make it a seamless and enjoyable happening, celebrating >>>>>> Chrome, rather than berating it. >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Francis >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> [-list] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Francis, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm Philip, one of the folks behind removing this from Chrome. I'm >>>>>>> sorry to hear this broke your pages. You may be able to use the polyfill I >>>>>>> wrote at https://github.com/progers/pathseg. Other folks have found >>>>>>> this to be a drop-in replacement. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Initially it was somewhat of a challenge 15 years ago to wrap my >>>>>>>> head around building SVG paths via pathSegList and its methods. I >>>>>>>> persevered, and thereby have about 200 files within various apps online >>>>>>>> that use this feature. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I believe Google has seriously jumped the gun in dumping this >>>>>>>> feature with no warning to developers. It will take quite a few >>>>>>>> hours/days/weeks to fix my pages to run in Chrome. In the meantime about >>>>>>>> 50% of my users will crash when getting into the SVG path. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm hoping for a bit of feedback to the Chrome folks to reconsider >>>>>>>> this, and a rollback to support of SVG's pathSegList. HELP! >>>>>>>> See the following: >>>>>>>> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=539385 >>>>>>>> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=568735 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards & Thanks, >>>>>>>> Francis Hemsher >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2016 19:06:47 UTC