- From: Nikos Andronikos <Nikos.Andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:53:01 +0000
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2016/08/25-svg-minutes.html
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
SVG Working Group Teleconference
25 Aug 2016
[2]Agenda
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2016Aug/0062.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2016/08/25-svg-irc
Attendees
Present
Tav, nikos, stakagi, shepazu, AmeliaBR, shepazu_
Regrets
Chair
Nikos
Scribe
nikos
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]SVG 2 CR publication update
2. [6]TPAC meeting plans
* [7]Summary of Action Items
* [8]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
SVG 2 CR publication update
nikos: We are all about ready to go - have given three weeks
for review and haven't had any comments
... DoC is all ready to go and I'm putting together an archive
for publication
... then we need to send a transition request email to plh
... I can do that - think we've met all the criteria required
shepazu: Yes, we'll potentially need to schedule a call with
plh
... so next Tuesday is probably too soon to aim for publication
nikos: I'm away next week - but happy to have a call
shepazu: Why don't we have the call the week after, and mention
that in your transition request email
AmeliaBR: Monday the week after is a holiday in the US
nikos: If anyone wants to push small changes, I can still
rebase the cr branch
AmeliaBR: I pushed some small ones this morning. I'm still
looking at the Conformance chapter and will probably add an
introduction and do some rework
... I'll have processing modes first and then referencing modes
because that's the order in which they're defined
nikos: The only big thing I've done is get rid of all the ready
for review markup
... since CR should be reviewed as a whole
AmeliaBR: The only other thing - we want at the same time to
get SVG Animations WD published
nikos: That's on my list - should be easy once I've got SVG 2
ready to go
TPAC meeting plans
nikos: We have about 8 people registered for TPAC - not the
usual attendees, so it might be a good opportunity to talk
about some different things
... we probably won't work through issues, but it might be a
good opportunity to talk about some different things
... maybe the test suite, or increasing participation in the
group
shepazu: talking to the testing people will be really important
nikos: Yeah, I was planning to spend the week prior getting my
head around all the testing stuff
... I'll send out an agenda request to www-svg and see if we
get any response
AmeliaBR: Most important i think is getting test suite prepared
and rechartering
... getting some clear commitments from the larger players
shepazu: don't know if we'll recharter, but we might extend the
charter
AmeliaBR: it's a conversation that needs to be started
... As far as testing, it's important because all the browsers
have their own test suite. It's a matter of leveraging those
and getting those contributed and vetted to make sure they're
testing what needs to be tested
<AmeliaBR> trackbot, end telcon
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the information from your system.
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2016 23:53:35 UTC