- From: Nikos Andronikos <Nikos.Andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:53:01 +0000
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2016/08/25-svg-minutes.html [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - SVG Working Group Teleconference 25 Aug 2016 [2]Agenda [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2016Aug/0062.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2016/08/25-svg-irc Attendees Present Tav, nikos, stakagi, shepazu, AmeliaBR, shepazu_ Regrets Chair Nikos Scribe nikos Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]SVG 2 CR publication update 2. [6]TPAC meeting plans * [7]Summary of Action Items * [8]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ SVG 2 CR publication update nikos: We are all about ready to go - have given three weeks for review and haven't had any comments ... DoC is all ready to go and I'm putting together an archive for publication ... then we need to send a transition request email to plh ... I can do that - think we've met all the criteria required shepazu: Yes, we'll potentially need to schedule a call with plh ... so next Tuesday is probably too soon to aim for publication nikos: I'm away next week - but happy to have a call shepazu: Why don't we have the call the week after, and mention that in your transition request email AmeliaBR: Monday the week after is a holiday in the US nikos: If anyone wants to push small changes, I can still rebase the cr branch AmeliaBR: I pushed some small ones this morning. I'm still looking at the Conformance chapter and will probably add an introduction and do some rework ... I'll have processing modes first and then referencing modes because that's the order in which they're defined nikos: The only big thing I've done is get rid of all the ready for review markup ... since CR should be reviewed as a whole AmeliaBR: The only other thing - we want at the same time to get SVG Animations WD published nikos: That's on my list - should be easy once I've got SVG 2 ready to go TPAC meeting plans nikos: We have about 8 people registered for TPAC - not the usual attendees, so it might be a good opportunity to talk about some different things ... we probably won't work through issues, but it might be a good opportunity to talk about some different things ... maybe the test suite, or increasing participation in the group shepazu: talking to the testing people will be really important nikos: Yeah, I was planning to spend the week prior getting my head around all the testing stuff ... I'll send out an agenda request to www-svg and see if we get any response AmeliaBR: Most important i think is getting test suite prepared and rechartering ... getting some clear commitments from the larger players shepazu: don't know if we'll recharter, but we might extend the charter AmeliaBR: it's a conversation that needs to be started ... As far as testing, it's important because all the browsers have their own test suite. It's a matter of leveraging those and getting those contributed and vetted to make sure they're testing what needs to be tested <AmeliaBR> trackbot, end telcon Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the information from your system.
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2016 23:53:35 UTC