W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2015

Re: agenda+ css-writing-modes-3 review

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:00:43 -0400
To: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Erik Dahlström <erik@xn--dahlstrm-t4a.net>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Message-ID: <56129EAB.1020409@inkedblade.net>
On 10/05/2015 10:37 AM, Tavmjong Bah wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've completed my review of the spec for issues 47 and 53 and have some
> conclusions:

Thank you very much, Tav, for your detailed analysis!

> Issue 47:
>
> Over all the text looks fine.
>
> The 'note' in 3.1.1 I think should be removed.

Done.

> In 3.1.1.2, there seems to be an error in the UA stylesheet: it should
> be 'horizontal-tb' not 'horizontal-tbl'.

Fixed.

> The discussion of 'glyph-orientation' appears to match what we decided
> at the Paris 2015 FXTF meeting.

Excellent.

> Issue 53:
>
> I think the answer is yes. [...]

Great! I have updated the spec as follows:
   https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/9787deded31d/css-writing-modes/Overview.bs
   https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes/#svg-writing-mode

Let us know if this looks good, or if there are further edits that are
warranted.

~fantasai
Received on Monday, 5 October 2015 16:01:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:03 UTC