- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:27:31 -0700
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, 'www-svg' <www-svg@w3.org>, 'Chris Lilley' <chris@w3.org>
On 03/25/2015 10:46 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: > To be clear, it's not about "SMIL-events", it's any user-initiated > interactivity, including the navigation of links, hover effects, etc., > which also includes events that trigger animations. > > I think these should be allowed for SVGs in <img>, but we have to figure > out what that would mean. Right, CSS hover effects are another good (non-SMIL-related) event interaction model here. Semi-strawman suggestion: maybe we'd even want to allow mousewheel scrolling of overflow:scroll content? This doesn't seem very "image-like", but it is in line with a "secure interactive animated mode". "Navigation of links" scares me. I think you'll agree that we shouldn't allow navigation to *external links* from inside an image. :) This is a natural extension (requirement?) of the "no external resources" rule for SVG-as-an-image. We could conceivably allow navigation *to an anchor within the image-document*, but this would still let the image change its own URL, which seems to introduce undesirable complexity. ~Daniel
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 17:28:02 UTC